Down an Unfamiliar Road

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LXVII) 04/21/22

^4:10 This is real love—not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent His Son as a sacrifice to take away our sins.

Dr. Hodge explains that the Greek text in verse ten is clear, there are still some who “do not believe testimony which God testified concerning His Son.” God is saying that He offered us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.[1]  There could hardly be a more straightforward statement of the Scriptural doctrine as to the nature of faith. Its object is what God has revealed. Its ground is God’s testimony, and receiving that witness seals our belief that God is faithful. To reject it is to make God a liar. We find this teaching in the Holy Scriptures. The basis on which we are authorized and commanded to believe is not conforming to the truth revealed for our understanding, nor its effect upon our feelings, nor it’s meeting the necessities of our nature and condition, but simply, “Thus saith the Lord.”[2]

William Lincoln (1825-1888) observes that when anyone invents a religion or cult, which links them to Jesus because He took on human nature, they forget that He was a holy human and humankind are not born holy but as wretched sinners. In verse ten, the Holy Spirit says, “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the remedy for our sins.” In other words, God created us, so He could love us. Here we see love in its descending scale; it will reach us, no matter how low we are. Lincoln said that he often observed that when Christians discuss these things, the truth is so strong, so extreme, they frowned at it. He also listened as Christians spoke of the Anointed One hanging on “the accursed tree.”

This is not the language of Scripture; Scripture does not say the tree was cursed, but He who hung upon it was cursed; not the tree, but the holy, blessed, pure One, was made a curse for us; the Holy Spirit says it. He was not only accused but was “made a curse.”[3] It is strong language, which everyone would hesitate to use unless the Holy Spirit said so, as if all our curse fell upon Him. Oh, Lord! Your love is great, stooping down until He could not get any lower. “The Anointed One was made sin for us,”[4] there is the agápe of God “completed.” If we are Christians at all, it is because His agápe reached down as far as it could to save us.[5]

Alfred Plummer (1841-1926) again picks up on how “Herein” refers to what follows: Love in its complete perfection is seen, not in man’s love for God, but His to humanity, which reached a climax in His sending His Son to save us from our sins. The superiority of God’s agápe does not lie merely in its being Divine. It is first in order of time and therefore necessarily spontaneous: ours is at best only love in return for love. His agápe is unbiased; ours cannot easily be so.[6] To be “the propitiation” is literally “as a propitiation (atoning for).” In verse nine, it is parallel to “that we might live through Him.” But at the same time is an expansion of it. It states how eternal life is won for us.[7]

Robert Smith Candlish (1806-1873) states that we are to love as God loves, and because God loved the world that He sent His Son to save all who believed. Therefore, we are to love one another like God’s longing and yearning for someone’s salvation, that all may turn and live; and with what passion to delight in all who are really in the Anointed One, who “live through Him,” and live to be indeed our brothers and sisters because they are His![8]

William E. Jelf (1811-1875) points out that love spoken of here is more certainly and truly conceived when we don’t think of our loving God, but of His loving us. Love has its origin not in human nature, but in God and His Divine nature. It is not a chief attribute of human nature or human excellence, with God being the object whereby we honor Him and His deeds, which forces Him to love us in return. Still, the most authentic and highest conception of agápe existed before human love and was exhibited to us, so we are motivated to love God. This then being the perfect type of love, human love must be reformed in like manner. As God’s agápe exhibited itself chiefly in love towards those He has redeemed by His Son, so must our love be directed towards and displayed in the same objects. Hence, the love of brothers and sisters – proper love only for those in whom it is interested – is not to be some type of Christian love, but the Divine agápe towards the redeemed.[9] Agápe also refers to the past instances of God’s agápe to us rather than its present impact. In verse nine, the Greek verb apostellō (“sent”) expresses the continued and permanent effect of God’s past acts of agápe -love.[10]

John Stock (1817-1884) makes a good point. He says if we conclude that we can make it without God’s grace, then grace would cease to be grace. A poster read: “Grace is getting something you don’t deserve, and mercy is not getting what you deserve.” On the second Sunday in Lent, the Anglican Church has the priest pray, “Almighty God, who sees that we have no power of ourselves to help ourselves: Keep us both outwardly in our bodies, and inwardly in our souls; that we may be defended from all adversities which may happen to the body, and from all evil thoughts which may assault and hurt the soul; through Jesus the Anointed One our Lord. Amen.” The problem is, we are in love with that which will destroy us.  “All that hate Me,” says God, “love death.”[11] As soon as we are born, we go astray and begin lying, says Stock. As such, we are voluntarily sinners and alienated from the life of God due to the ignorance that is in us, [12] and we should get all the punishment we deserve as a result of our immoral deeds.

Again, notes Stock, here is what the priest prays on the fourth Sunday of Lent: “Grant, we beseech You, Almighty God, that we, who for our evil deeds do worthily deserve to be punished, by the comfort of Your grace may mercifully be relieved; through our Lord and Savior Jesus the Anointed One. Amen.” A carnal mind has hatred against God, for it is not subject to God’s law, nor can it be.[13] People’s mouths are compared to an open grave – out of which come infections – and they are off and running to where they can wound, assault, and even kill.[14] They lack peace and are full of ingratitude filled with sinful tendencies, without understanding, unmerciful, a sinner, and having pleasure in those like themselves.[15] The Methodist Articles of Faith read: “We are accounted righteous before God only for the merit of our Lord and Savior Jesus the Anointed One, by faith, and not for our works or expected merits.”[16]

Stock concludes. To oppose the agápe of God, as presented by grace in the Gospel with unbelief, is to be insensible of it; refuse its offered benefits; leave unnoticed the outstretched hand of God, pleading with us to be reconciled to Him; live, as if no such revelation existed; push salvation away from us without any let-up, is to resist the Holy Spirit.[17] We are being as wicked as we can be by disobeying more than Satan, to whom no such offer of salvation was ever made, and plunge headlong into an incomprehensible pit of endless misery and be a partaker of a deserved damnation.[18]

Johannes H. A. Ebrard (1818-1888) sees John emphasizing the truth that love consists in this – not that we love God, but that He loved us. First, we must inquire what the words mean and how they are construed; then, their impact. Agápe is expressed here in the widest generality, and it is wrong and illogical to explain it here by “God’s agápe to us.” The expression, “The agápe of God to us, consists not in our love to God, but in His agápe to us,” would have been no better than a meaningless platitude.

So, to what end could the Apostle have so formally stated what was so plainly understood? He speaks quite generally of the nature of love universally, and expresses a thought of much importance in itself. All love consists – that is, has its root – not that we love God, but, that He loved us. According to its essence, love has its source in God’s agápe to us, not in our love for God. It is not by nature, striving upward towards God which proceeds from mankind, but a flame which proceeds from God, that kindles agápe – love in the human heart. Therefore, it is divine and flows from the essence of God. So, our love is nothing but the production and copy of the perfect agápe of God.[19]

Charles Kingsley (1819-1875) asks, “What is any kind of love worth which does not show itself in action; which does not show itself in passion, in the true sense of that word, namely, in suffering?” On the Cross of Calvary, God the Father showed His character and the character of His co-equal and co-eternal Son and the Spirit that proceeds from both. The comfortable, prosperous individual shrinks from the thought of the Anointed One on His Cross. It tells them that those better than them have had to suffer, and that God’s Son had to suffer. But they do not like suffering; they prefer ease and luxury.

Yes, says Kingsley, many say too often, as long as the fine weather lasts and all is smooth and bright, they’ll do what they can. But when setbacks come with losses, affliction, shame, sickness, grief, bereavement, and still more, Passion week begins to mean something to them; and just because everything is going bad, the cross looks the brightest of all time. It’s then that the Cross of the Anointed One brings a message such as no other thing or being on earth can bring. It says – God does understand your situation. The Anointed One understands what you are going through. According to the whole world, the entire universe, sun, moon, and stars, proves the law that nothing lives merely for itself; God ordains everything to help the surrounding things, even at its own expense.[20]

---

[1] 1 John 5:10-11

[2] Ibid. Vol III, pp. 65-66

[3] Galatians 3:13

[4] 2 Corinthians 5:21

[5] Lincoln, William: Lectures on 1 John, op. cit., Lecture VII, pp.118-119

[6] Cf. Titus 3:4

[7] Plummer, Alfred: Cambridge Commentary, op. cit., p. 149

[8] Candlish, Robert S., First Epistle of John, op. cit., pp. 104-105, 118

[9] See 1 John 2:3

[10] Jelf, William E., First Epistle of St. John, op. cit., p. 61

[11] Proverbs 8:36

[12] Ephesians 4:18

[13] Romans 8:7

[14] Ibid. 3:13, 15

[15] Ibid. 1:20, et. al.

[16] Articles of Religion (Methodist), Article IX, John Wesley’s abridgment of the Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England.

[17] Acts of the Apostles 7:51

[18] Stock, John: Exposition of First Epistle of John, op, cit., pp. 346, 349

[19] Ebrard, Johannes: Biblical Commentary on the Epistles of St. John, p. 290

[20] Kingsley, Charles, Biblical Illustrator, op. cit., Vol. 22, pp. 74-75

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LXVI) 04/20/22

^4:10 This is real love—not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as a sacrifice to take away our sins.

Isaac Barrow (1630-1677) repeats the Apostle John’s words here, “This is how God showed His agápe-love to us: He sent His only Son into the world to give us life through Him. True love is God’s agápe-love for us, not our love for God. He sent His Son as the way to take away our sins.”[1] Can we imagine, asks Barrow, any equal, any such expression of kindness, of mercy, of humbleness, of goodness, like the King of the Universe, perfectly glorious and free to offer His most dearly beloved Son to suffer abusive grievous torments, for the welfare of His declared enemies, traitors, and rebels – sinners like you and me? God expressed such goodness to us. Therefore, it is only fitting that we show our gratitude to Him.[2]

Daniel Whitby (1638-1726) says that here, in this verse, the Apostle John expresses the freedom and the greatness of the agápe-love of God with great energy.  As for its privilege, He loved us first when there was nothing in us to deserve or move people to pity our miserable state. But there were many things that both deserved and might have provoked God to implement His anger, since by our wicked ways we were His enemies. Yet, see its greatness: First, the great God of heaven sending someone who humbled Himself even in addition to what was, and He did in heaven. Therefore, shouldn’t we be fully aware of His presence? Second, the person God sent was His only-begotten Son, His legitimate Son.[3] For if we call God His approving Father, it makes Him equal to God, [4]

By His Father calling Him His only Son, says Whitby, we must equally exalt Him. Even Episcopius[5] declares Him to be called such because He received His essence from the Father, His source. For it is certain that the John is here praising the agápe-love of God to the highest pitch and therefore must use this phrase, the only-begotten Son of God, in the most inspiring sense in which that word is used in Scripture. Third, the world to which He was sent was full of wickedness. Fourth, the errand on which He was sent: One, to give Himself up as a sacrifice for the ransom payment for our sins: Two, to procure for us, who were dead in trespasses and sins, eternal life.[6]

William Burkitt (1650-1703) observes that the wisdom and power of God did not act to the fullest of their effectiveness in the work of creation; He could have framed a more glorious world had it pleased Him to do so. But God’s agápe-love in our redemption by the Anointed One could not be expressed or presented to a higher degree. Therefore, when Almighty God wanted us to give the most excellent demonstration of His favor, He gave us His eternal Son, the Son of His agápe-love. In fact, the giving of heaven itself, with all its joys and glory, is not as full and perfect a demonstration of the agápe-love of God as the giving of His Son to die on our behalf. That’s what we call unconditional love.[7]

Thomas Pyle (1674-1756) feels that we should be awestruck by the fact that by an act of divine love, God procured a pardon and salvation for a sinful world by sending His Son to become human for our sake, which must be amplified beyond comparison, that it began on God’s part, was voluntary and free, without the least merit or obligation on our part to persuade Him to do it.[8]

John Brown of Haddington (1722-1787) say that the Apostle John shows us here that God’s agápe-love was manifested toward us by sending His only begotten and eternally beloved Son to assume our nature; and by obeying and dying on our behalf to atone for the sins of such worthless worms, enemies, and ungodly wretches – that He might thereby purchase eternal salvation and everlasting joy for us, and successfully bestow it on us.[9] It raises the question, “And what have we done for Him lately?”

Charles Simeon (1759-1836) says that some might ask, couldn’t God find another way of accomplishing His plan of salvation other than sending His only Son? But when you stop to think about it, it is reasonable to believe that nothing less than the incarnation of His only-begotten Son could make it happen. And how wonderful it is that He adopted such a marvelous measure as that! Yet, no matter how much He might desire our rescue from sin, it is still incredible that He should ever condescend to use such means to effect it: yet we are told that He did so. That’s why, says Simeon, He didn’t send an angel, nor an Archangel, nor all the hosts of angels, but “His only-begotten Son, into the world, that we might live through Him.”[10] [11]

There is no other religion on earth that can make this claim. It is in Christianity alone that God sends His only Son to die for sinners so that He might have millions of sons and daughters in His royal family. Why worship any god who is only imaginary when you can serve an unimaginable God like the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?

Edward Dorr Griffin (1770-1837) tells the touching story of Cleopatra (the Younger), the wife of Armenian King Tigranes the Great. On a particular weekday when Cyrus, the conqueror of Asia, was reviewing his troops, the captives pressed forward to see the conqueror. Tigranes, who served in Cyrus’ army, saw that His father, mother, sisters, brothers, and even his wife were among the prisoners; he presented himself before Cyrus and offered a thousand talents for the redemption of his wife. Among the observations made afterward respecting the appearance and glory of the conqueror, this noble lady was asked what she thought of Cyrus. On what was your attention fixed? Her answer was, “On the man who offered a thousand talents for my redemption.”[12] [13]

So, says Griffin, on whom should the attention of Christians be chiefly fixed, but on Him who gave, not a thousand talents, but His most precious life, for their redemption? For instance, when we watch Judah, we admire his generosity and concern for the sorrows of an aged parent, offering himself to servitude in for favorite son, Benjamin, of the deceased Rachel.[14] But what was this compared with Him who took the sinner’s place under the law, so to speak, received the full punishment of Divine wrath? Let all the archives of antiquity be explored; bring forward all the generous sacrifices of Greece and Rome, and how they compare to God’s amazing love displayed here? The love which we celebrate stands alone and without a challenger. It is the most profitable subject of contemplation that can occupy the mind. It carries you up to those views of God, which are the most sublime, the most transforming, and the most joyful.[15]

Adam Clarke (1772-1832) tells us that in the principles of the Christian religion, we have, therefore, three great gifts, for which we should incessantly magnify God: First, His Son, the Anointed One Jesus. Second, The influence of His Holy Spirit. And, Third, His holy Word, “This is love: not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.”[16] [17]

Augustus Neander (1789-1850) says that regarding the revelation made in humanity that God is Love, the Apostle John then refers in the succeeding words. “God showed how much He loved us by sending His only Son into this wicked world to bring us eternal life through His death. In this act [herein], we see what real love is: it is not our love for God but His agápe-love for us when he sent His Son to reconcile us with God.”[18] When you think of the word “reconcile,” it infers a previously good relationship – like the case of the Prodigal Son.[19] So, when did we have a favorable relationship with God? It was through Adam and Eve before their fall. Now, the only way to reconcile humanity with the Father is through His Son, who took the punishment for sin on Himself and died on our behalf to pay the ransom price.

Gottfried C. F. Lücke (1791-1855) says that in verse ten, the Apostle John makes the greatness of God’s agápe-love the sending of the Anointed One more apparent by showing that this agápe-love was not God’s return for our love to Him, or, as it were, love of the second rank; but rather a pure love of mercy and because of this agápe-love He sent His Son as satisfaction for our sins.[20] Therefore, even without considering the redemption through the Anointed One, man’s love to God is only love in return, and God is always the first to love; in this respect, too, agápe-love is always God’s love.[21] [22]

Charles Hodge (1797-1878) sees the goodness of God in the form of generosity as revealed in the whole constitution of nature. As the universe abounds with life, it also overflows with enjoyment. There are no devices in nature to promote pain for its sake, whereas the manifestations of design for the production of happiness are beyond counting. The expression of God’s kindness in the form of love, especially love to the undeserving, is the great end of the work of redemption as John wrote in his Gospel, [23] and here in verse ten, he spells out how God displayed His compassion on earth. Therefore, the Apostle prays that believers might be able to comprehend the height and depth, the length and breadth, of that love which passes knowledge.[24] [25]

---

[1] 1 John 4:9-10

[2] Barrow, Isaac: An Exposition on the Creed, op. cit., p. 180

[3] Romans 8:32

[4] John 5:18

[5] Episcopius, Simon: (1583-1643), was a Dutch theologian and systematized Arminianism, a liberal reaction to the Calvinist doctrine of predestination. He studied theology at Leiden and in 1610 became a pastor at Bleiswyk, Holland

[6] Whitby, Daniel. op. cit., p. 467

[7] Burkitt, William, Notes on the N.T., op. cit., p. 731

[8] Pyle, Thomas: Paraphrase, op. cit., p. 396

[9] Brown, John of Haddington: Self-Interpreting Bible, op. cit., p. 1328

[10] John 3:16

[11] Simeon, Charles: Horae Homileticæ, op. cit., Discourse 2455, p. 481

[12] Cyropaedia: Education of Cyrus I by Xenophon, translated by Walter Miller, Bk. 3, Section 1

[13] Griffin, Edward D: Biblical Illustrator, op cit., Homilies, 1 John 5:9, 10

[14] Genesis 44:18-34

[15] Griffin, Edward Dorr, Biblical Illustrator, First Epistle of John, op. cit., pp. 65-66

[16] 1 John 4:10; See Luke 11:13; John 5:39

[17] Clarke, Adam: Clavis Biblica, op. cit., The Apocalypse, or Book of the Revelation p. 52

[18] Neander, William: First Epistle of John, op. cit., Chapters IV, V, pp. 257-258

[19] Luke 15:11-32

[20] John 3:16; Romans 5:6ff, 8:22ff

[21] See 1 John 5:7

[22] Lücke, Gottfried: Bible Cabinet, op. cit., Section Eight

[23] John 3:16

[24] Ephesians 3:19

[25] Hodge, Charles. Systematic Theology, op. cit., Vol. I, pp. 427-428

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LXV) 04/19/22

^4:9 God showed how much He loved us by sending His only Son into this wicked world to bring us eternal life through His death.

The keyword for the work of the Anointed One on the cross by which sin’s death penalty was removed for those who believe in Him is translated in the KJV as “propitiation.” In Hebrew, the word is “kapparah,” which means “atonement.” Such atonement is wrought vicariously by sacrificing an animal who dies in the sinner’s place.  The Greek word used by John here is “hilasmos,” which means “appease,” which carries the idea of satisfying someone by giving in to their demands. So, the Anointed One brought about the atonement by pleasing God with the required sacrifice, which was His life for our punishment.

God took the initiative to reach out in love to us. This model for our love is a model of creativity in sacrifice. It is not our nature to spontaneously love God or others.  We do not love God in an unsolicited manner.  We did not take the initiative in love; God did.  Love begets love.  God’s agápe-love causes a reply of love in us. The word “but” shows a strong contrast.  The word “us” is emphatic and contrasts with another decisive term, “He.”  Love for God never originates in man, but always in God.  God sought us; we did not seek Him. 

God took action in loving us. He sent His Son to die on the cross.  His agápe-love was not in response to man’s love, but was initiated wholly within Himself. It was His plan from eternity to do this. The only two instances of “propitiation” are in this verse and 2:2. There is another word for propitiation, “expiation.” On occasion, it means satisfaction or mercy seat.  The First Covenant presents the idea of “expiation” in atonement or covering of sins by sacrifice to free a person from sin. God transferred the penalty of sins to animal sacrifice. God removes our guilt by sacrifice. The judgment of God on the Anointed One at the cross appeases His wrath against the one who accepts the Anointed One’s suffering for sin. Jesus was the only one who could satisfy the demands of a perfect God. Jesus satisfied God by dying in our place and taking our eternal punishment on the cross. Divine love takes the initiative to love others.

Therefore, don’t let anyone think that any higher manifestation of love than this can be offered. It is not in any love humanity can show to their Creator. But in their Maker’s love for them, the fundamental nature of love can be perceived. Note the change from perfect to aorist tense in verse nine expresses the permanent results of the Anointed One’s mission. The Greek verb apostellō (“sent” KJV; “sending” NLT) implies that the assignment is an accomplished fact. Some Bible scholars say that Jesus was the substitute sacrifice for our sins. But this is a conflicting statement because He was not a substitute. No other suitable, required ransom could be found in heaven or on earth. Therefore, the only replacement form was that He died on our behalf, since we did not qualify as an acceptable sacrifice to God. As Dr. Grant Richison says, “Jesus took our hell that we might have His heaven.”[1] [2]

COMMENTARY

John Cassian (360-432 AD) tells us that the perfect love with which God first loved us will come into our hearts, for our faith promises us that this prayer of our Savior will not be in vain.[3]

And Bede the Venerable (672-735 AD) states that we come to God not by our own merits but by the bestowal of His grace alone, as John bears witness when he says that we did not love God; instead, He loved us. Therefore, this is the most significant sign of God’s agápe-love for us. For when we could not seek Him because of our many sins, He sent His Son to us so that through Him, forgiveness will be extended to all who believe in Him and call us back into the fellowship of His fatherly glory.[4]

John Calvin (1509-1564) amplifies God’s agápe-love by noting that He gave us His only Son when we were still His enemies.[5] But the Apostle John employs other words that God loved humanity without any effort on their part to love Him and loved them unconditionally. He meant by these words to teach us that God’s agápe-love towards us has been so full of grace. Therefore, although it was John’s object to present God as an example to be imitated by us, the doctrine of faith that he intermingles ought not be overlooked. God willingly loved us. How so because He loved us before we were born and also when, through immoral living, we turned our hearts away from Him.

Calvin says that here some appearance of inconsistency arises. If God loved us before the Anointed One offered Himself to die on our behalf, what need was there for reconciliation? Thus, the death of the Anointed One may seem to be unnecessary. To this, Calvin answers, that when the Anointed reconciled us with the Father, this is to quiet our apprehensions. For since we are conscious of being guilty, we cannot conceive of God being anything other than displeased and angry with us. So, until the Anointed one absolves us from sin’s guilt, we will have no peace of mind. Wherever sin appears, God’s wrath could be expected and impose the judgment of eternal death. Hence, we would undoubtedly be terrified by the prospect of death until the Anointed One by His death abolishes sin and delivers us by His blood from hell. Further, God’s agápe-love requires righteousness; we may then be persuaded that we are loved; we must of necessity come to the Anointed One, in whom righteousness alone is found.[6]

In his institutes, Calvin says that God’s free favor is as fitly opposed to our attempt at salvation by works as is obedience to the Anointed One. The Anointed One could not merit anything save by the good pleasure of God, but only since He was destined to appease the wrath of God by His sacrifice and wipe away our transgressions by His obedience. On the other hand, since the merit of the Anointed One depends entirely on God’s grace, compliance is no less appropriately opposed to all self-righteousness. We find this distinction in numerous Scriptures.[7] The first place is assigned to God’s agápe-love as the chief cause or origin, and faith in the Anointed One follows. Should anyone object that the Anointed One is only the formal cause, it lessens their energy than the word justify. If we obtain justification by faith that leans on Him, we must seek the groundwork for our salvation in Him. Several passages prove this: “This is love: not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.”[8] [9]

John Trapp (1601-1669) points out that it is not that we loved, but that He loved us. So, it reads in the Latin Vulgate, “He first loved us so much, so free, so small, etc.” God greatly loved us first and freely, though we were sinners and worthless. “He loved us because He loves us,” said Moses, [[10] which is the ground of His agápe-love being His alone. He works for His name’s sake[11] four times, notwithstanding His word and oath.[12] [13]

John Owen (1616-1683) says several things differ between the mutual love of the Father and the saints by which they have communion. First, the agápe-love of God is a love of bounty; our love unto Him is a love of duty. Second, the love of the Father came first; our love unto Him came later. Thirdly, the agápe-love of God is like Himself – equal, constant, not capable of augmentation or diminution; our love is like ourselves – unequal, increasing, waning, growing, declining.

Owen then explains the second difference in light of what the Apostle John says here in verse ten about God’s agápe-love came first, ours, second. In other words, His agápe-love came before ours. When the child doesn’t know their father, how much less do they love him? Yes, we are by nature what the Greeks call theostygēs (“haters”), haters of God. And God, by His supernatural nature, is called filantropos (“philanthropically”) – a lover of people. Surely, all mutual love between God and us begins with Him.[14]

Owen goes on to say that we should remember the remarkable result of being elected by God to be one of His children. As the Apostle Paul says, “Even before He made the world, God loved us and chose us in the Anointed One to be holy and without fault in His eyes.”[15] The prophet Isaiah speaks of the Jews left in Jerusalem being called “Holy.”[16] God’s aim and design in choosing us were that we should stand holy and unblameable before Him in love. He is the one to accomplish and bring about in them that are His. The message is this: God chose you to be the first fruit of His Gospel and saved through the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit and belief in the truth.[17] This the Father designed as the first and immediate end of electing love and proposes we consider that love as a motive for holiness.[18] [19]

John Flavel (1627-1691) asks, “Why does the Apostle John magnify this gift by saying, ‘Herein is love,’ as if there were nothing else!” To have our life carried so many years like a candle in the hand of Providence, through so many dangers, and yet not extinguished into obscurity, that is love? To have food and suitable clothing, beds to sleep on, relatives to comfort us, in all these are love? Yes, but if you speak comparatively, in all these, there is no love like the love expressed by God in sending or sacrificing the Anointed One for us. These are great mercies in themselves, but compared to this mercy, they are all swallowed up, like the light of candles when brought out into the sunshine. No, herein is love that God let the Anointed One die on our behalf. And it is remarkable that when the Apostle Paul showed us the noblest fruit that most commends to us the root of divine love that bears it, [20] he then offered this fruit; “But God showed His great love for us by sending the Anointed to die on our behalf while we were still sinners.”[21] It is the very flower of that love.[22]

---

[1] See John 15:13; 1 Corinthians 15:3; Galatians 1:3-5; 3:10-14; 1 Peter 2:24, 3:18

[2] Richison, Grant C: Verse by Verse Commentary, A Practical in-depth and Applicable Commentary for Church Leaders, op. cit., loc. cit.

[3] Cassian, John: (Bray Ed), James, 1-2 Peter, 1-3 John, Jude, op. cit., loc cit.

[4] Bede the Venerable, Ancient Christian Commentary, Vol. XI, Bray, G. (Ed.), James, 1-2 Peter, 1-3 John

[5] Romans 5:8

[6] Calvin, John: Commentary on the Catholic Epistles, op. cit., loc. cit.

[7] Cf. John 3:16; 1 John 3:16

[8] 1 John 4:10

[9] Calvin, John: Institutes, op. cit., p. 551

[10] Deuteronomy 7:7-8

[11] See Ezekiel 20:9, 14, 22, 44

[12] Ibid. 20:13, 15, 23

[13] Trapp, John: Commentary upon all books of New Testament (1647), op. cit., p. 477

[14] Owen, John: On Communion with God, Ch. 3, op. cit., p. 38; Also see: “A Vindication of Some Passage in a Discourse Concerning Communion with God,” p. 49

[15] Ephesians 1:4

[16] Isaiah 4:3-4

[17] 2 Thessalonians 2:13

[18] 1 John 4:8-10

[19] Owen, John: op. cit., Ch. 7, p. 233

[20] 1 Corinthians 13

[21] See Romans 5:8

[22] Flavel, John: The Fountain of Life, op. cit., Sermon 4, p. 53

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LXIV) 04/18/22

^4:9 God showed how much He loved us by sending His only Son into this wicked world to bring us eternal life through His death.

Stephen S. Smalley (1931-2018) notes that the Apostle John now demonstrates that God’s character as love is determined and understood by His self-disclosure in Jesus the Son. It’s not what we think of Him, but what He says about Himself. In so doing, John thoroughly explains his statement in the previous verse that “God is love” and recalls the traditional formulation, “He surrendered His life on our behalf.”[1] Moreover, John develops the thought in verses nine and ten together and links them to knowledge and love.[2] The true child of God knows God who is love, and that knowledge of God is experienced through the divine activity in the Anointed One.[3]

Ian Howard Marshall (1934-2015) says it would be hard to find a better illustration of the Apostle John’s point about the manifestation of God’s agápe-love through His Son than one of a fallen tree. Rings appear on the cut face in a cross-section of lines that run right up the trunk but are hidden from view by the bark.[4] So likewise, the cross of Jesus is the visual appearance in this world of love that stretches back beyond our vision into the depths of eternity. God sent His only Son into this world so that we might obtain life through Him. Here we see the two factors which determine the nature of love: on the one hand, self-sacrifice and, on the other, action done for the benefit of others.[5]

John Painter (1935) points out that God sent His only Son into the world to save the world and, as the Apostle John says, that “we” might live through Him. Does this mean that the purpose of life giving was from the beginning intended only for the group included in this “we?” Of course, this depends on how the “we” is understood. There is nothing John says to suggest that there is a foreordained group selected “to live through Him.” Nevertheless, the purpose and the consequence are “that we may live through Him.” The key is to understand the scope of the “we.”[6]

Michael Eaton (1942-2017) asks, “How do you measure love?” One way, he says, is to consider whether it shows itself or takes any action. That’s how God manifested His agápe-love. It is not simply a theory or a hidden feeling in God. It has revealed itself in what He has done for us. Another way is to consider how much it is willing to do? How committed will it be? How great a sacrifice is it ready to make? Also, in a situation of dispute and quarrel, love is measured by asking which side takes the first step to bring about reconciliation and harmony.[7] With this analysis, we can see that God’s agápe-love for us met all these requirements.

William Loader (1944) states that the Apostle John’s love theology is centered on his understanding of Jesus. What is Love? Love is an act by one good person for another person’s good. Supremely, the Apostle John identifies such action in God’s initiative: this is how “He showed His agápe-love among us: He sent His only Son into the world that we might be saved through Him.” In this formulation, John draws upon a tradition that also found its way into the Gospel in the famous verse: “God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that everyone who has faith in Him may not perish but have eternal life.”[8] It appears in one of its earliest forms in the Apostle Paul’s letters.[9] In some forms of this tradition, only the expression “only Son” takes the form of “beloved”[10] or “His own.”[11] [12]

Robert W. Yarbrough (1948) Robert W. Yarbrough (1948) says that we might understand verse nine as a statement of means rather than a goal: God reveals Himself by sending His Son. But it is possible to see the actual point in the final clause: “So that through Him, we might live.” In the love-laden context of verses seven through fourteen, we are to  “live” to the fullest God-enabled sense, to love as God demands and deserves. So, what the Apostle John says here may be taken, accordingly, as an affirmation in support of verse seven’s imperative to love each other. Such love is a possibility because God’s purpose in sending His Son into the world was to bring about the God-given life of regeneration. In both his Gospel and in this epistle, John makes it abundantly clear that to “live” in this sense is also to love.[13]

Bruce G. Schuchard (1958) says that the Apostle John makes all the more explicit the love that the secessionists have refused. The love that is “of God” and “is God” was made “manifest” among us. Thus, John speaks of the love of God not in general but in specific terms. Particularly important is the fact that God has taken the initiative. The Greek verb phaneroō (“manifested”) connotes the divine activity in the incarnation. To the very community that owes its existence to God’s love, He made His love known “in this way” in sending of His.[14] We must not miss the underlying implications of phaneroō, which also denotes making “the invisible, visible” and the “the unknown, known.”

 Ken Johnson (1965) proposes that since God’s love was manifested by Jesus’ coming in the flesh as the “only begotten Son,” then a person cannot be born of God and have eternal life without confessing Jesus as God’s only Son. But, of course, this means a believer must also be a Trinitarian Christian.[15] Nevertheless, like the Jews who rejected Jesus despite His teachings and miracles, we now have the Unitarians and “Jesus Only” movement, plus others like the Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, etc. The only thing is that when Jesus returns a second time, He will make it clear that He, the Father, and the Spirit are three-in-one.

Duncan Heaster (1967) highlights that the supreme manifestation of God’s love was the cross. We live through Him in that He gives us the gift of His life, His spirit, the kind of thinking He thinks, and the life He lives, breathing it into every open heart through God’s gift; the Comforter. As the Father sent the Son into the world, His Son sent us into the world in obedience to the great commission.[16] Our mission likewise is to manifest His love and to give others the gift of His life, acting as a channel for the gift of His life/Spirit.[17]

Karen H. Jobes (1968) makes the point that the uniqueness of Jesus the Anointed One is foundational in Christian theology. Christianity is not based on human or animal sacrifice, for God did not choose one of His human children or a lamb as Abel did to sacrifice on behalf of the others. God’s agápe-love, in that case, could be questioned. But God stepped into humanity in the person of Jesus, making Jesus a unique human being, uniquely qualified to pay the penalty for the fallen human race. God was willing to be sacrificed on the cross to experience human life and death; such is His agápe-love for us. Therefore, God’s agápe-love is not contingent on the circumstances of our lives. Good things may happen; bad things may happen; but God’s unchanging agápe-love remains unaltered because of the cross, which stands unchangeable throughout human history.[18]

Douglas Sean O’Donnell (1972) says that these lines from a sacred hymn explain what the Apostle John tells us here: “Amazing love! How can it be that Thou, my God, shouldst die for me?”[19]  Our relationship with God is not conditional on our initial love for God and His affirmative response to us. We did not first love God; rather, He loved us first. He is the “great initiator.” Love is not best demonstrated by God’s people’s heeding the Shema “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.”[20] Instead, it is through God sending His Son to be “forsaken” by Him so that we might be forgiven through Him. God’s exceptional Son offered an extraordinary sacrifice for our sins. Through Jesus’ atoning death, He removed the guilt of our sins, appeased God’s wrath, and gave us eternal life. Now, “live through Him.”[21] [22]

4:10a   True love started with God’s agápe-love for us, not when we started loving Him.  He proved this by sending His Son to take the penalty for our sins.

EXPOSITION

Moses knew that there had to be another reason why God chose to liberate His people from bondage.  So, he says: “Why did the Lord love and choose you? It was not because you are such a large nation. You had the fewest of all people! But the Lord brought you out of Egypt with great power and made you free from slavery. He freed you from the control of Pharaoh, the king of Egypt. The Lord did this because He loves you, and He wanted to keep the promise He made to your ancestors.”[23]

The natural ego killer for some believers, especially those ?who pretend to be holy to make an impression on God and others, is that their affection and adoration toward God is not love! Real love was expressed when God sent His son to die for those who hated Him. What then is that emotion we feel for God we refer to as love?  Nothing more than the return signal of the love He sent, an echo of His mercy and grace. In each case where John speaks of our loving one another, it is more than just saying the word.  He also says that the hallmark of a believer’s love for God is that they love their brother and sister in the Anointed One. It goes then without saying: if we can’t love one another, how can we say that we love the sinner?

---

[1] John 3:16; cf. 1 Corinthians 15:3

[2] 1 John 4:7-8

[3] Smalley, Stephen S., Word Biblical Commentary, Vol. 51, op. cit., p. 240

[4] Peter Abelard, a Novel by Helen Waddell, Henry Holt and Company, New York, 1947, p. 264

[5] Marshall, I. Howard. The Epistles of John (The New International Commentary on the New Testament), op. cit., pp. 213-214

[6] Painter, John. Sacra Pagina: 1, 2, and 3 John: Vol., loc. cit.

[7] Eaton, Michael: Focus on the Bible, 1,2,3 John, op. cit., pp. 148-149

[8] John 3:16, see verse17

[9] Romans 8:3; Galatians 4:4; see also Romans 8:32 and Ephesians 5:1

[10] Mark 12:6 or

[11] Romans 8:32

[12] Loader, William: Epworth Commentary, op. cit., p. 52

[13] Yarbrough, Robert W., 1-3 John (Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament), op. cit., p. 237

[14] Schuchard, Bruce G., Concordia Commentary, op. cit., p. 447

[15] Johnson, Ken. Ancient Epistles of John and Jude, op. cit., p. 78

[16] John 17:18

[17] Heaster, Duncan: New European Commentary, op. cit., 1 John, p. 32

[18] Jobes, Karen H., 1, 2, and 3 John (Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on The New Testament, Book 18), p. 192

[19] “And Can it Be that I should Gain,” by Charles Wesley (1738)

[20] Deuteronomy 6:4-5

[21] 1 John 4:9

[22] O’Donnell, Douglas Sean. 1–3 John (Reformed Expository Commentaries), op. cit., loc. cit., Kindle Edition

[23] Deuteronomy 7:7-8

When we think of the word “harmony,” it is often associated with music, orchestras, and singing. But it goes far beyond that because it is not just a sound; it is a passion.

One of India’s great statesmen, A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, once said, “Where there is righteousness in the heart, there is beauty in character. When there is beauty in character, there is harmony in the home. When there is harmony in the home, there is order in the nation. When there is order in the nation, there is peace in the world.”

In Montreal, Canada, Robert J. Vallerand of the Social Behavior Research Laboratory University of Quebec states that harmonious passion originates from an independent acceptance of the activity into one’s identity. In contrast, obsessive passion emanates from a controlled acceptance and comes to dominate the person. Through the experience of positive emotions during activity engagement that takes place on a regular and repeated basis, it is suggested that harmonious passion contributes to sustained psychological well-being while preventing the experience of negative affect, psychological conflict, and ill-being. On the other hand, obsessive desire is not expected to produce such positive effects and may even facilitate adverse effects, competition with other life activities, and psychological ill-being.

Psychologist Tom G. Stevens of California State University tells us that harmonious functioning creates peak learning, performance, and happiness. He explains that occasionally everything in our mind and body functions harmoniously. For instance, we might be playing tennis and seem to be at one with the court, the ball, and the movement. We feel confident in hitting the ball where we want. Our mind and body are highly energized, but not overly so. We are especially alert and can focus on the ball and where we want to hit it. When are we in this state because we are involved in and loving what we are doing, we are performing at our best.

But Stevens says this harmonious state occurs during tennis and other activities such as fellowshipping, conversing, solving a problem, having a special vacation experience, or appreciating a beautiful sunset. During these experiences, we feel as if every cell in our mind and body is functioning at some optimal level, doing what it was intended to do. This type of functioning is exceptionally healthy for our psychological and physical health. At the same time, its opposites–prolonged anxiety, anger, or depression–are unhealthy states. Evidence increases that too much time spent in these negative emotional states is detrimental to our mental and physical health.

Finally, these harmonious experiences may be similar to what American Psychologist Abraham Maslow referred to as “peak experiences.” He found that self-actualizing people–especially those who focused more on mental activities–tended to have many more peak experiences than most people. He characterized these peak experiences as a feeling of inner harmony and oneness with themselves and the universe.

Psychologist Tim Lomas asks, “What comes to your mind when you think of well-being?” Perhaps health and happiness, love and relationships, safety and security, prosperity and success, meaning and purpose, and so on. These are all valuable and often even necessary.

But what about balance and harmony? These are potentially less obvious, but may be among the most important qualities of all. As I’ve explored in a new article, balance, and harmony (B/H) are not merely relevant to well-being but a “golden thread” running through its myriad dimensions. As such, an overarching definition of well-being might be the dynamic attainment of optimal balance and harmony in any — and ideally all — aspects of life.

We also learn that harmony is described as “subjective well-being.” It was introduced as a combination of long-term levels of positive affect, lack of negative affect, and satisfaction with life. This concept presents three hallmarks: (1) it is subjective, that is, it depends on the individual experience, (2) it is not the mere absence of negative affect but also includes the measure of positive states, and (3) it includes a global assessment of one’s life rather than a specific domain. Since this initial concept, other approaches to well-being have been provided.

For instance, the theory of “psychological well-being” as a composite of six domains (self-acceptance, positive relations with others, individualism, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth) has received extensive experimental support. In a similar vein, some divide well-being and mental health into three major categories: emotional well-being (described as the presence of positive feelings and absence of negative feelings about life), psychological well-being (private and personal evaluations of one’s positive functioning in life), and social well-being (public and social criteria of people’s functioning in life including dimensions such as social coherence, social actualization, social integration, social acceptance, and social contribution).

Then psychologists Paula Thomson and S. Victoria Jaque tell us about the dualistic model of passion delineates two opposing forms of passion, harmonious versus obsessional. Harmonious passion implies that people shape part of their identity around the activity they desire. For example, most performing artists will self-define as musicians, singers, dancers, or actors. They internalize the activity they love into their identity. The action is a significant part of their life, but they can also maintain and find meaning in other interests and relationships with others. Engaging in their passionate activity does not provoke conflict in their life; hence it is defined as harmonious passion. Obsessive passions indicate that the performer experiences an uncontrollable need to participate in the activity; however, their internalization and self-identity are also contingent on acceptance. Their self-esteem is diminished by negative emotions, reflection, physical and psychological tension, and difficulties maintaining relationships.

As we can see, all of this applies to other areas of our lives such as marriage, family, church, social gatherings, spiritual living, etc. So, what does the Bible say about harmony?

In one of King David’s favorite Psalms, he says, “How wonderful and pleasant it is when brothers live together in harmony! . . . Harmony is as refreshing as the dew from Mount Hermon that falls on the mountains of Zion. And there the Lord has pronounced his blessing, even life everlasting.”[1]

Then the Apostle Peter wrote to his followers that their minds should be in harmony with each other. Sympathize with each other. Love each other as brothers and sisters. Be tenderhearted, and keep a humble attitude.[2]

But the Apostle Paul was the most vocal about harmony. First, he told the Roman believers to “Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited.”[3] Then later, he tells them, “Let us aim for harmony in the church and try to build each other up.”[4] And finally, he prayed, “May God, who gives this patience and encouragement, help you live in complete harmony with each other, fitting for followers of Christ Jesus.”[5]

Paul also said to churches,” I appeal to you, dear brothers and sisters, by the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, to live in harmony with each other. Let there be no divisions in the church. Instead, be of one mind, united in thought and purpose.”[6] Furthermore, he spoke of the need for unity by telling them, “Since God chose you to be the holy people He loves, you must clothe yourselves with tenderhearted mercy, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience. Make allowance for each other’s faults, and forgive anyone who offends you. Remember, the Lord forgave you, so you must forgive others. But, above all, clothe yourselves with love, which binds us all together in perfect harmony.”[7]

And lastly, Paul urged them that “Above all, you must live as citizens of heaven, conducting yourselves in a manner worthy of the Good News about Christ. So then, whether I come and see you again or only hear about you, I will know that you are standing together in harmony with one spirit and one purpose, fighting together for the faith, which is the Good News.”[8]

---

[1] Psalm 133:1, 3 – New Living Translation

[2] 1 Peter 3:8

[3] Romans 12:16 – NIV

[4] Ibid 14:19

[5] Ibid 15:5

[6] 1 Corinthians 1:10

[7] Colossians 3:12-14

[8] Philippians 1:27

If you were on Jesus’ mind while He was suffering on the cross, how often is He on your mind when you go through hard times? Remember we celebrate Easter because it was a victory not a defeat. Of all the Kings, Presidents, and Emperors who have died, Jesus’s death and resurrection is the only one commemorated around the world. That’s why He should be on our minds every minute of every day. HAPPY EASTER!

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LXIII) 04/15/22

^4:9 God showed how much He loved us by sending His only Son into this wicked world to bring us eternal life through His death.

William MacCallum Clow (1853-1930) tells us that Love, as the Apostle John tells us again and again, is to be seen and known only in what it does. Therefore, we should look at this Love of God disclosing itself in lovely deeds and rise step by step to see the supreme disclosure in the Cross of the Anointed One. There are six things that we can teach ourselves about Love to make it more meaningful and authentic:

            The first and simplest thing about love is this – love is a social passion. There cannot be love

                 without at least two, one to love and one to be loved.

            The second simple thing about love is this – love is creation. Love must create, and it must

                 create well-being. Love cannot be inactive.

            The third simple thing about love is this – love is forethought. Love cannot be content with

                 creation. It must pass on to care, and God’s care is His providence.

            The fourth and great thing about love is this – love is grace. It is where love makes its supreme

                  disclosure. Grace is love, dealing with wrongdoing.

            The fifth thing to say about love is this – love is discipline. Love’s supreme disclosure is the

                 Cross, but love which redeems must pass on to discipline. Love’s redeeming work was not

                 finished when the Anointed One confronted the gates of hell.

            The sixth thing to say about love is this – love is heaven. In Final Covenant teaching, that is the

                 issue of love’s work on the Cross and by the discipline of God. Love can never be satisfied

                 without the loved one’s constant presence and fellowship.[1] 

David Smith (1866-1932) states that the Incarnation is a manifestation of God’s agápe-love because it reveals divine nature, and divine nature is love. When we receive God into our lives, we experience His divine love.[2] The Apostle John applies the term exclusively to Jesus. It carries the idea of preciousness.[3] Notice the phrase “my precious life” in the Psalms.[4] The Incarnation manifested the agápe-love of God, and the love was displayed that we might have everlasting life. Eternal Life is not the future, but the present.[5] It is important to remember to take a good hard look at Jesus. He’s the centerpiece of everything we believe, and faithful in everything God gave Him to do.[6]

Harry Ironside (1876-1951) shows us a mathematical clue on finding that God is love. First John. 1+1=2; 2+2=4; 4+4=8; 8+8=16. Thus, “God is love” is found in 1 John 4:8 and 16. That is where you learn that “God is love.” Creation called out God’s omnipotent power and wisdom, but creation could not tell about His agápe-love. But when God looked down upon a world of people groaning under the death sentence of sin, He saw a world of humanity who were alive to the things of this life but utterly dead toward the things of God, dead in trespasses and sins. God found it in His heart to go down and find a means of quickening whosoever will come into newness of life. He said, “I will give them the greatest gift anyone can give, My only-begotten Son. I am going to send Him into that world that they may have everlasting life through Him.” “In this was manifested the agápe-love of God toward us, because God sent His Son into the world, that we might live through Him.”[7]

Charles H. Dodd (1884-1973) notices that here, in verse nine, the Apostle John restates the great declaration he made in his Gospel[8] about God’s agápe-love. It reminds us that in speaking of God’s agápe-love, we think of love in action, definite, concrete, and recognizable on the historical plane. Verse ten underlines one point in this declaration: the Christian religion starts not with mankind’s love for God but God’s agápe-love for humanity and with God’s agápe-love expressed in specific actions in history.

Dodd then helps remind us that Judaism and Christianity were not the only religious philosophy prevalent in the world at the Apostle John’s time. And as much as we may want to isolate Christian thought from anything except that breathed by God through the Holy Spirit, those who penned what the Spirit inspired them to write were, nevertheless, influenced by such thinking.[9] In one case, Aristotle turns this aesthetic and passionate mysticism into a metaphysical doctrine of the relation of God to the world. God is absolute Reality and therefore changeless and unmoved. Yet, He is the cause of all change and movement in the universe. But how? “He moves the world as the Object of its love (or desire).”[10]

Love, therefore, becomes a cosmic principle, says Dodd, and the mystical craving for union with the eternal receives its philosophical basis. The type of religion to which this language belongs is everywhere. In such beliefs, love is essentially the love of humans for God – that is to say, the unquenchable craving of limited, conditioned, and temporal beings for the Infinite, the Absolute, the Eternal. Love for humankind cannot be attributed to God, for the Absolute must be passionless and unmoved.[11] Perhaps this enlightenment will help us better understand why the Apostle John was so adamant in his argument that it is not a case of God having Love, but that God IS Love.

Let us note, Dodd points out, that the Greek verb agapaō appears seven times in this chapter, translated as “loved” three times. All three places, 4:10, 11, and 19, are in the aorist active tense. That means our love for Him (verse 10); His agápe-love for us (verses 11, 19) has no beginning nor end. In other words, God’s agápe-love has no expiration date, and neither should ours.[12] Swedish Lutheran theologian Anders T. S. Nygren (1890-1978) clearly states that: Plato’s “heavenly Eros” is wrong. It is a human love for the Divine, a love of man for God.[13] Nygren insists that “There is no room for the ‘love of friendship’ in a God-centered relationship to God, for that love presupposes an equality between Divine and human love which does not exist.”[14] Then Nygren writes, “Christian love is something other than ordinary human love.”[15] He follows that with, “Jesus draws a sharp distinction between human love and Divine. When measured by the standard of Divine love; therefore, human love is not loving at all.”[16] He adds, “Divine love can no longer be used for human love.”[17]

F. F. Bruce (1910-1990) says that the Apostle John has already pointed to the Anointed One’s laying down His life for His people as the perfect manifestation of love.[18] He returns to the sacrifice of the Anointed One and presents it from the Father’s point of view in words similar to those of the Gospel.[19] The supreme act of God’s love was His sending “His only begotten Son into the world.” The purpose of His sending His Son is our blessing – “that we should receive life through Him.” Here the initiative lies entirely with God. Before there was any possibility of our exercising such love, He first manifested it when He “loved us and sent His Son as a ransom for our sins.”[20] [21]

Raymond E. Brown (1928-1998) states that “He loved us” in verse ten refers to a specific action on God’s part in sending His Son. It distinguishes human love from perfected love.[22] Others think that the secessionist did not love their brothers and did not claim to love God. On the contrary, I would argue that both John and the antagonists claimed to love God and each other. John is arguing with the renegades not about a priority that they attribute to love for God, but about whether the atoning death of Jesus was a necessary part of God’s saving love.

David E. Hiebert (1928-1995) notes that the Apostle John announces the manifestation of redemptive love in the Incarnation here in verse nine. By using “in this” (“This is how” – NIV), it looks forward to and is interpreted by the following “because.” Thus, it clarifies that God’s agápe-love was revealed through the sending of His Son. It may also be understood as locative, [23] meaning that God’s agápe-love was embodied in sending His Son. Hiebert notes that Alfred Plummer (1746-1829) suggests that “for the sake of uniformity, [24] it would be preferable to render “herein” each time.”[25] Also, the verb “was manifested” is a favorite term with John. It means “to make visible, make clear, come out into the open.” This is contrary to the secular stories of romance, where “secret love” or “lovers” pursue their target until the right moment so that their suddenly revealed love will be a surprise. But verse nine implies that before the first coming of the Anointed One, “the agápe-love of God,” God’s agápe-love for humanity, had not been displayed in such a personal, dynamic manner. In Him, God’s message of love reached its climax.[26] [27]

---

[1] Clow, William M: The Cross in Christian Experience, Hodder & Stoughton, New York, 1908, pp. 42-50

[2] Cf. Galatians 1:16; See Luke 7:12; 8:42; 9:38

[3] Cf. Psalms 22:20 (22:21 Jewish Bible); 35:17 (LXX)

[4] Ibid. New International Version

[5] Cf. John 17:3

[6] Hebrews 3:1

[7] Ironside, Harry A., The Epistles of John and Jude, op. cit., pp. 139-140

[8] John 3:16; 1 John 3:16

[9] Cf. Acts 17:28; 1 Corinthians 15:33; Titus 1:12

[10] Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book XII, Part 7, ⁋2

[11] Dodd, Charles H., The Moffatt Commentary, Johannine Epistles, op. cit., p. 110-111

[12] See Anders Nygren “Agápe and Eros, the Westminster Press, Philadelphia, Part I, 1932; Part II, Vol. 1, 1938; Part II, Vol 2, 1939.

[13] Nygren, Anders, Agápe and Eros, Translated by Philip S. Watson, The Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1953 p. viii

[14] Ibid. p. 92

[15] Ibid. p. 93

[16] Ibid. p. 96

[17] Ibid. 128

[18] 1 John 3:16

[19] John 3:16

[20] See 1 John 2:2

[21] Bruce, F. F., The Epistles of John: A Verse-by-Verse Exposition, op. cit., Kindle Edition

[22] Brown, Raymond E., The Anchor Bible, op. cit., pp. 518-519

[23] Locative indicates place in or on which or time at which something occurred.

[24] See 1 John 4:10, 13, 17

[25] Plummer, Alfred E., Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, op. cit., p. 148

[26] Hebrews 1:1-2

[27] Hiebert, David E., Bibliotheca Sacra, op. cit., January-March 1990, p. 73

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LXII) 04/14/22

^4:9 God showed how much He loved us by sending His only Son into this wicked world to bring us eternal life through His death.

John Stock (1817-1884) admires the beauties of nature that amaze us, but believes that God’s grace in our redemption surpasses His creative genius that defies description. In essence, wealth, power, goodness, perfection, wisdom, and unity are displayed everywhere in creation; but in the kingdom of God, added to all these excellencies are mercy, justice, and unspeakable love. God is incredible, and His works are done with grace and mercy. “Can you solve the mysteries of God? Can you discover everything about the Almighty?”[1] That God the Father is love is seen in the mission of His co-equal and co-eternal Son in this evil world for our common salvation; loving us “While we were still His enemies,”[2] “when lost.”[3] and incapable of delivering ourselves, and without a desire to do so, being dead in trespasses and sins.[4] What a mighty God we serve. [5]

William Kelly (1822-1888) exclaims that God still sent His only-begotten Son into the world in the face of humanity’s depravity. What a truth! The bare facts are incredible, especially as it was in nothing but love. It was not something done in heaven. His Only-begotten Son He willingly sent to give life in this world was characteristic of the God who sent Him. But no work done even by the Son on high could suit either God or humanity. So, the way of love was that the Son should become human to glorify God and give life to humanity’s dead faith in His highest nature.

Jews and other nations already existed, says Kelly, but they were spiritually dead in their offenses and sins and angry children by their Adamic nature. As a people, they were spiritually dead while claiming they lived. They expressed no hatred for sin, no love for grace; not one trait inwardly or outwardly was right in them.[6] The Gentile concept of circumcision and the Jewish thought of uncircumcision were hostilities against God. Despite that, God sent His Only-begotten Son, the delight of the Father through all eternity, into the world, that we should live through Him; and the life given was His life.[7]

Daniel Steele (1824-1914) takes issue with the shallow and weak Unitarian explanation of the “best-beloved Son.” In vain, extreme liberalism teaches that all humans are incarnations of God to a lower degree than Jesus. “Only-begotten” denotes unique sonship, an unshared existence grounded in God’s nature, while mankind’s reality is grounded in God’s will. It is the difference between the generation of the Son outside of time limits, “before the world was,” and the creation of the universe by His choice. “The Anointed One,” says Steele, “is the One only Son, the One to whom the title belongs in a sense unique and singular, as distinguished from that in which there are many children of God.”[8] [9]

Brooke F. Westcott (1825-1901) states that God’s love is not simply “toward us,” but also “in us,” as to how it was revealed and effective “that we may live through Him.” The Christian shares the life of the Anointed One, and so becomes a secondary sign of God’s agápe-love. There is a sense in which creation shows God’s agápe-love, but this revelation becomes apparent through the new creation.[10] The manifestation of God’s agápe-love to humanity becomes a living power as they manifest His agápe-love to their fellow believers.[11]

William Lincoln (1825-1888) suggests that we look at three specific revelations mentioned in the Final Covenant. The first is here in verse nine – the manifestation of God’s agápe-love. The second is this – I will manifest myself to Him (speaking of the one who loves Him).[12] And the third is – when He will appear.[13]He begs us to remember that these three must be maintained in their divine order, their proper order. Otherwise, you may make mistakes. I have often heard people say, “I want a demonstration of the agápe-love of God,” but they forget that God not only does things, but He does them in order.

Lincoln adds that now we find that God’s phenomenon of His agápe-love[14] depends on our obedience. In this, the Anointed One is in unity with the Father. But here in verse nine, God sent His Son without any compliance on our part. That was in the past; the second is continually going on, and the third is in the future.[15] There is the divine order of the three expressions of God’s agápe-love, one past, one present, and one future. If anyone insists, “I still want a sign,” they must ask themselves, am I thoroughly established in God’s agápe-love as manifested? If someone wants a display before being saved. First, God has given them an overwhelming instance of His agápe-love by sending His Son. It would be a mocking of the revelation of Himself that He has already given. The second expression does not occur before the first. You must begin with the gift of God, the gift of His Son, His only Son. God DOES love us, and He HAS manifested that love.[16] What more do you need?[17]

Henry A. Sawtelle (1832-1913) takes the words, “That we might live through Him” as the intention of the Anointed One’s mission – a dependable, not dependent, purpose regarding believers. The object of the task, referring to our greatest good, impresses us with God’s agápe-love, as does the self-sacrificing means to effect it. The giving up of the Son, the giving Him to come into such a world, and the thoughtful, merciful object of the mission combine to provide the believer with an impressive view of the extent and the quality of God’s agápe-love. The “living” is the true immortality reached in regeneration and resurrection through the mediation of the Anointed One. The whole verse condenses a volume of truth. It is a remarkable statement of the mission of the Anointed One and its spring in the eternal agápe-love of God. It demonstrates the love-nature asserted in the previous verse.[18]

John James Lias (1834-1923) remarks that this great subject of love occupies us as far as chapter 5:3; but, as usual with the Apostle John, the divisions of his subject overlap each other, and the conclusion of his teaching on love introduces the topic of Love’s source, namely, faith. Here the fact of the Anointed One’s coming and the results of that coming, the life we have by His provisions, is regarded as a demonstration of God’s agápe-love. In other places, the Anointed One is pointed out as the manifestation of the fullness of the Divine essence.[19] The Revised Version “in us” is to be preferred to the Authorized Version (KJV) “toward us,” which cannot be defended.[20] The agápe-love of God is manifested in us because the Anointed One, His Son, who is One with Him, [21] is sent into the world, and He “dwells in our hearts by faith.”[22] [23] So, since the Son and Father are one, we become one with them when they come to dwell in us. How foolish, then, for anyone in union with God to even think of insulting Him by breaking His laws and grieving His will?

Lias then reminds us that the Anointed One’s coming was predicted from the beginning “at many times and in various ways.”[24] His method was expected.[25] A new covenant was to be made, not in the letter but the heart, including Gentiles. But, if Israel with Moses and the Prophets became grievously corrupt, how much more the rest of the world? Nor was there any remedy. Religion could not bring it, for religion was itself corrupt in every country of the world save one. Philosophy was unable to deliver it, for it did not rest on God’s testimony but men’s opinions. Even God’s painful judgments could not bring it. They pointed out the disease, but not the cure. Men knew that they were sinners, but they didn’t know how to forsake their sins.[26] The only thing that could bring a remedy was the Christian Gospel, telling about the Anointed One and His cross.

Erich Haupt (1841-1910) says that when we consider that all other acts of God in history and nature also manifest His agápe-love, though not in the same degree as this; but when we discern in these the tokens of love, our knowledge is at second hand: of all this, we might say that God’s agápe-love appears in us to the world. But it is otherwise in the mission of the Son. It had for its purpose and result that we might know God, for God is love – that is, we are to be transformed by it, the divine life is to be implanted in us, and thus most assuredly, the agápe-love of God is to be manifested in us because we are to be drawn into the fullness of this divine nature of love.

Therefore, says Haupt, agápe-love not only works with its energy for the world’s sake but for our very inner being. And under both aspects, His nature of love has been most perfectly revealed in the mission of His Son: by it, He has surrendered the whole fullness of His divine nature, all that He has; and so, surrendered it that He communicates it to us as a gift; it is not merely a power working for us and in us, but the power energizing within us has become part of our personality. Only when the Anointed One for us is the Anointed One in us do we exhaust the meaning of the words “God is Love.”[27]

One commentary suggests that the expression “in us” in verse nine may refer to an inward revelation of God’s agápe-love, because of the incarnation of the Son.[28] As such, it could be translated: “Therein the agápe-love of God made itself known in us.”[29]

---

[1] Job 11:7 – New Living Translation (NLT)

[2] Romans 5:10

[3] Matthew 18:11

[4] Ephesians 2:1

[5] Stock, John: Exposition of First Epistle of John, op. cit., pp. 343-344

[6] Psalm 14:3; cf. Romans 3:10-12

[7] Kelly, William: An Exposition of the Epistles of John the Apostle, op. cit., Logos, loc. cit.

[8] See John 1:12-14

[9] Steele, Daniel: Half-Hour, op. cit., p. 105

[10] 2 Corinthians 5:17

[11] Westcott, Brooke F., The Epistles of St. John, op. cit., p. 148

[12] John 14:21

[13] 1 John 3:2

[14] John 14:21

[15] 1 John 3:2

[16] Ibid. 4:10

[17] Lincoln, William: Lectures on the Epistles of St. John, op. cit., pp. 114-115

[18] Sawtelle, Henry A., An American Commentary, Alvah Hovey Ed., op. cit., pp. 49-50

[19] John 1:18, 14:6; Colossians 2:9

[20] See also the change of “in us” (RV) and “to us” (AV)

[21] John 10:30

[22] Ephesians 3:17

[23] Lias, John James: The First Epistle of St. John with Exposition, pp. 312-313

[24] Hebrews 1:1

[25] See Jeremiah 31

[26] Lias, John James: The First Epistle of St. John with Homiletical Treatment, pp 310-311

[27] Haupt, Erich: The First Epistle of John, op. cit., p. 261-262

[28] Cf. Romans 5:5; 2 Corinthians 4:6

[29] Revised English Scriptures with Notes, The First Epistle of John, American Bible Union, New York, 1854, p. 45

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LXI) 04/13/22

^4:9 God showed how much He loved us by sending His only Son into this wicked world to bring us eternal life through His death.

William Burkitt (1650-1703) points out that it was a remarkable instance of God’s agápe-love, that He considered our case and concerned Himself for our happiness, as nothing is more helpful to human nature than love. Therefore, if no love assists more than some people exercised with great disdain after a provocation, it does not match God’s agápe-love to offending sinners.[1]

Johann Bengel (1687-1752) explains that in verse nine, “toward us” – that is, God’s agápe-love, which is now ours throughout our whole spiritual experience, “because” – this motive of love is derived from verse three. It is said respecting Jesus the Anointed One, who is come in the flesh, mutual love is inferred in verse seven. The consequence is proven from the agápe-love of God towards us, as we see in verse nine, who sent His Son, that we might live. It is proof of God’s agápe-love towards us: it is a motivating factor for our mutual love for each other.[2]

James Macknight (1721-1800) says that the Apostle John says here in verse nine is an allusion to our Lord’s words in John 3:16. The Anointed One is called God’s only begotten Son to distinguish Him from all others, who are called the sons of God in Scripture. It is to intensify our idea of God’s agápe-love to us, in giving a Person of such dignity, and so beloved of God, to die for us. It is possible that by John giving the Anointed One the title of God’s only begotten Son, he intended to overturn the error of the Ebionites, [3] and Cerinthus, [4] who avowed that the Anointed One was not God’s Son by nature, but that, like other distinguished men, He was honored with the title of God’s Son on account of His virtues; in which opinion these founders of heretical sects have been followed by some into modern times. However, those who hold this opinion should show why the only begotten nickname is applied to the Anointed One.[5]

William Jones (1726-1800) is sure that God’s Word is weightier than any human testimony. The Apostle John’s meaning is that if we feel it obligatory not to reject human testimony when clear and adequate, that much more should we consider it binding on us to receive God’s testimony, especially when it concerns the Anointed One. What John says here in verses nine and ten is more significant than any human testimony could be. In what sense? It is more meaningful because of its origin – God. Some unbelievers might, and probably would say, “Granted, God’s testimony is greater than mankind’s. But since it’s God’s testimony, is there any way to prove that it’s true.” John would answer, “No one is asking you to believe it blindly; that’s why God proved it by showing it to the world. He sent His Son to communicate His Word.”

Rev. Jones concludes with lyrics from an old Church hymn sung in the 1700s that express the sentiments of both sinner and saint:

Hence and forever from my heart

I bid my doubts and fears depart;

And to those hands, my soul resign

Which bear credentials so divine.[6]

English Philosopher Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) acknowledges that “at the back of all things there is an infinite energy.”[7] Spencer said that if the energy is infinite, it can let us know something about itself as a starting point. (1) If the infinite energy consents to tell us something about itself, it must be through such channels of life, thought, and words as we can apprehend. (2) The fact that the communication channel may be human is entirely consistent with the origin of communication being Divine. (3) When this is the case, such human communication has to be interrogated and tested as to where it came from and how. (4) If it stands this test, namely, if (a) it claims to be from God, if (b) it justifies that claim, [8] and if (c) there is nothing inconsistent with the claim, – then the proof of the validity of its testimony is complete.[9]

Richard Rothe (1799-1867) points out that there was no better way for God to reveal that He is love than to send His only Son into the world with a message of that love. In doing so, God also established that love is a gift. In many commentaries, I read that love is a “free” gift. If it is a gift, it has to be free; otherwise it is not a gift. So, there is no used in using “free” with gift. You cannot buy it, merit it, bargain for it, nor earn it. True agápe love is a gift from Love Himself, by which He gave Himself to the world through His Son. So, if you accept His Son, you also accept His agápe-love.

Consequently, says Rothe, it is only through a revelation, which factors in mankind’s ethical nature and ethical needs, that the agápe-love of God can be exhibited to us in its true light.[10] In other words, Rothe points out that no one knew of God’s agápe-love until He showed it. The same is true of us. We can talk about love, think about love, define love, preach love, etc. But until we manifest the existence of love in our hearts, it does not exist. Love is an act of our will, not a concept of the mind or emotion.

Alfred Plummer (1841-1926) says that we see the uniformity of verses 10, 13, and 17 with what the Apostle John says here in verse nine. We have the same Greek pronoun, toutō, in all four verses. “Herein” plainly refers to what follows.[11] John tells us that “In this was manifested the agápe-love of God.”[12] Here is another reason for our loving one another. We must do this (1) because love is the very essence of Him whose children we are; (2) because of the superior way in which His agápe-love was manifested. The context shows that “the agápe-love of God,” which usually in this Epistle expresses our love to God, here means His agápe-love to us.[13] [14]

Albert Barnes (1798-1870) gives us another outline to consider in determining the measure of God’s agápe-love. He died that we might have eternal life through the merits of His sacrifice. The extent of that love, then, which was manifested in the gift of a Savior, is to be found (1) in the worth of the soul; (2) in its exposure to eternal death; (3) in the greatness of the gift; (4) in the greatness of His sorrows for us; and, (5) in the immortal blessedness and joy to which He will raise us. Who can estimate all this? All these things will magnify themselves as we draw near to eternity, and in that eternity to which we go, whether saved or lost, we will have an ever-expanding view of the beautiful agápe-love of God.[15]

Thomas K. Arnold (1800-1853) tells us that the Apostle John had no doubt; neither do we need any, though some doubt it, thinking that God’s justice and hatred of sin interfere with His agápe-love. But justice does not interfere with God’s love. On the contrary, justice and love are compatible with humankind and God. The Cross of the Anointed One reveals and establishes the harmony between righteousness and mercy. There, justice gets its own, love has its way, God is a “just God and a Savior,” and “grace reigns through righteousness.” The Anointed One’s Cross is not the cause, but the consequence, of God’s agápe-love. The text asserts God’s agápe-love before He sent the Anointed One; affirms the Anointed One’s mission to be the manifestation of God’s agápe-love. There is no need for doubt, then, as to the fact that God loves us, has loved us. But more than this, the text not only implies that God is loving and loves us, but asserts that He is love. Love is the sum and harmony of all His attributes, His divine essence.[16]

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) asks what a ministry source is opened to us! It is the agápe-love of God in the Anointed One towards poor sinners. This agápe-love was fulfilled[17] in the death of the Son of man, who descended into the lowest depth of mankind’s misery. He who was glorified as God is now celebrated as a man. What a glorious function, and how small we feel as we kneel before Him. It is, indeed, the ministry of the Spirit and righteousness. Since God’s agápe-love is the source and the subject of the Anointed One’s passion, then God’s justice is accomplished in glorifying the Son of man upon the earth. He more than re-established all that glory of God (which was falsified and, in appearance, contradicted by the victory of Satan in the Garden of Eden and the ruin introduced into God’s creation); this righteousness also becomes its foundation. And because of this glorification of the Anointed One in power, there were also healings and miracles attached to this ministry, for miracles were likewise a confirmation of the essential part: the life-giving Word.[18]

---

[1] Burkitt, William: Notes on N.T., op. cit., pp. 730-731

[2] Bengel, Johann: Critical English Commentary, op. cit., p. 321

[3] Ebionite, member of an early ascetic sect of Jewish Christians. The Ebionites were one of several such sects that originated in and around Palestine in the first centuries AD, and included the Nazarenes and Elkasites. The name of the sect is from the Hebrew ebionim (“the poor”); it was not founded, as later Christian writers stated, by a certain Ebion.

[4] Cerinthus, (flourished c. AD 100), Christian heretic whose errors, according to the theologian Irenaeus, led the Apostle John to write his New Testament Gospel.

[5] Macknight, James: Literal Paraphrase, op. cit., pp. 91-92

[6] “Behold the Blind Their Sight Received” Lyrics by Isaac Watts (1707); Music by Frederick Marc Antoine Venua (1810)

[7] Article in Nineteenth Century Magazine, a publication of the Victorian Society in America, January 1884

[8] The claim might be justified (1) by the glory of pure moral teaching; (2) by the purity of personal character; (3) by mighty works. Jesus the Anointed One appealed to all three. This, however, is now regarded by some as an additional hindrance rather than a help. To such, we would offer the following hints. (a) The New Testament miracles are not merely wonders, but signs. They harmonize with a great redemptive plan. (b) If the evidence afforded by the noble moral teaching is sufficient, well, be it so, and wait for further light on what you deem miraculous, only remember: (c) That when we believe in one God and Father of all, we do in that one article of faith cover vastly more supernatural ground than all the recorded miracles put together. (d) Certainly there have been days when miracles were the very helps that men required. Our Lord did not prefer this. He complained of it. Apostles put miracles in the fourth place. But if to some minds they were the most efficient helps, it was very kind of the Father thus to stoop to teach His children in their infancy.

[9] Jones, William: First Epistle of John, Pulpit Commentary, Vol. 22, op. cit., Homiletics, pp. 149-150

[10] Rothe, Richard: The Expository Times, op. cit., February 1894, p. 232

[11] Cf. 3:16, 19

[12] See 1 John 1:2; 2:19, 28; 3:2, 5, 8

[13] 1 John 3:16

[14] Plummer, Alfred: Cambridge Commentary, op. cit., p. 148

[15] Barnes, Albert: Notes on N.T., op. cit., p. 4863

[16] Arnold, Thomas; The Church Pulpit Commentary, op. cit., Vol. 12, p. 297

[17] 1 John 4:9

[18] Darby, John N. On Ministry: Its Nature, Source, Power, and Responsibility, p. 12

NEW TESTAMENT CONTEXTUAL COMMENTARY

By Dr. Robert R Seyda

FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN

CHAPTER FOUR (Lesson LX) 04/12/22

^4:8 If a person isn’t loving and kind, it shows that they don’t know God – for God is love.

Karen H. Jobes (1968) points out that this is the third time the Apostle John mentioned: “the one who does not love.” Such a person remains in spiritual death.[1] Therefore, they do not have eternal life. The essence of that life is knowledge of God and the One He sent.[2] The failure to love is not simply an ethical failing, but means that one remains in the ignorance of sin, apart from salvation’s Light. Those who fail to love are outside the Christian community and have no truthful testimony of God, for they have no actual knowledge of God. As God defines it, personal understanding of God and agápe-love for others are inseparable. John’s appeal, therefore, implicitly demands self-examination.[3]

David Guzik (1984) notes that the love the Apostle John speaks of comes from the ancient Greek word agápe; it is the concept of a self-giving love that gives without demanding or expecting re-payment God-kind of love. Since this is God’s kind of love, it comes into our life through our relationship with Him. If we want to love one another more, we need to draw closer to God. Every human connection is like a triangle. The two people in the relationship are at the triangle’s base, and God is at the top. As the two people draw closer to the top of the triangle, closer to God, they will also draw closer to one another. Weak relationships grow stronger when both people draw near to the Lord![4]

4:9       This is how God showed His agápe-love to us: He sent His only Son into the world to give us life through Him.

EXPOSITION

In the opening of his Gospel, the Apostle John states, “The Word became a man and lived among us. We saw His divine greatness – the greatness that belongs to the Father’s only begotten Son. The Word was full of grace and truth.”[5] Then, later on in his story about Jesus and Nicodemus, John remarks: “God loved the world so much that He gave his only Son so that everyone who believes in Him would not be lost but have eternal life.  Yes, God sent His Son into the world, but He did not send Him to judge the world guilty, but to save the world through Him.”[6]

When Jesus fed the 5,000, He spoke about Himself as living bread and what partaking of the bread means, “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my body. I will give my body so that the people in the world can have life.”[7]  And when speaking about Himself as the Good Shepherd as opposed to those who claim to be shepherds, our Lord pointed out, “A thief comes to steal, kill, and destroy. But I came to give life-life that is full and good . . . I give My sheep eternal life. They will never die, and no one can take them out of my hand.” And when the Master wanted to comfort His followers in light of His leaving them for a short time, He told them this, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.”[8] [9]

So, it is clear that God meant for His expression of love to provide life.  However, no one should mistake John’s use of the word “love” here as the same as what the world calls “love.”  But love is like a light switch.  It is something we turn on and off at will.  It will not turn on by itself.  It cannot be programmed to turn on at a particular time to become automatic. But, when we turn it on, it can light up the room. People can see better and discern their environmental surroundings more clearly. It also gives warmth. When dealing with other people, we can turn love on or off. But when it comes to God, the switch is always on, day and night. King David gave an illustration of love for God and His word in Psalm One.

The phrase “in this” refers to what follows. John shows how the nature of God’s agápe-love concretely exhibits itself. God’s agápe-love for His Son existed for all eternity, but He manifested His agápe-love for us by sending His Son to earth to die for our sins.  God now shows how He demonstrates His agápe-love.  His best demonstration is in sending His Son to die for our sins.  God’s agápe-love is not motivated by any worthiness in us[10] but by His character. God “sent” His Son into the world.  The word “sent” carries the idea of being commissioned with a mission. God sent His Son on the unique mission to pay for our sins.[11] Sending God’s Son into the world was no passing act of sentimentality. This phrase does not imply that Jesus was reluctant to come into the world to die for our sins.  On the contrary, He was willing to come.[12] The standard of God’s agápe-love is the ultimate sacrifice. 

The words “only begotten” pertain to what is unique in being the only one of the same kind or class – unique. The Son is the One-of-a-Kind. He is incomparable to anyone else. God calls His Son “only begotten” five times in the Final Covenant. All five times occur in John’s writings, four in his Gospel and once in his first epistle. “Only-begotten” speaks of Jesus’ uniqueness rather than His origin. Jesus is the one-of-a-kind agent of the Father and the Father’s plan for salvation. God did not have another Son born of a woman. The Son of God is the Great One-of-a-Kind.

The word “that” expresses purpose. Without God’s purpose of sending His unique Son, the one-and-only Son, into the world to save us, we would be spiritually lost and subject to the Second Death, eternal death.

John sets the word “live” in stark contrast to the idea of spiritual death. It is to live in the absolute sense—to live forever with God. God loved us so that we could experience eternal life, His life. God loved us so that we might live eternally. Physical life came through creation, but spiritual life comes through the death of the Anointed One. God fully manifested His unconditional love to us at Calvary. 

Verse nine is similar to what John said in chapter three, verse sixteen. Also, “in this” refers to what follows and introduces a concrete and crucial example of love. Beware of the inadequate and misleading rendering “towards us.” It means in us and belongs to “manifested.”[13] We must not connect “the love of God in us,” still less “the love of God toward us,” is one idea. “In us” means “in our case,” and we can paraphrase the whole thing to read: “A transcendent manifestation of God’s love has been made regarding us, in that he has sent,” etc. The verse might serve as a summary of John’s Gospel. The word “only begotten” as applied to the Anointed One is peculiar to John; it and “we might live” are the keywords of the passage. This is love indeed; God’s only Son He sent to give us eternal life.

COMMENTARY

In his epistle to the Philippians, Polycarp (69-155 AD) urges them to remain in hope and patience. He encourages them to persevere in hope continually and the seriousness of right living, which is Jesus the Anointed One, who bore our sins in His body on the tree, [14] who did not sin, neither was there any artificial word coming from His mouth, [15] but endured all things for us, that we might live in Him.[16] Let us then be imitators of His patience, and if when persecuted for His name’s sake, [17] let us glorify Him. For He has set Himself as an example, [18] and we believe that such is the case.[19]

John Calvin (1509-1564) tells us that the agápe-love of God towards us testifies with many other proofs. For if someone asks why the world was created, tell them we have been placed here as stewards of the earth, we are preserved in life to enjoy innumerable blessings; we are endued with Light and understanding; no other reason can be adduced, except the gratuitous agápe-love of God. But the Apostle John chose its principal evidence, and what far surpasses all other things. It was not only an immeasurable love, that God spared not His Son, that by His death He might restore us to life; but it was His marvelous goodness which ought to fill our minds with wonder and amazement. Then, the Anointed One illustrates so memorable and singular a proof of divine love towards us that whenever we look upon Him, He fully confirms to us the truth that God is love.[20]

John Trapp (1601-1669) says that the manifestation of Jesus, God’s Son, the very seat of His tenderest compassion, is laid open to us.[21] God so loved His Son that He gave Him the world for His possession, [22] but He so loved the world that He gave Son for its redemption.[23]

John Owen (1616-1683) says that all those who believe that God’s love and grace are offered as the only way and means that Jesus the Anointed can provide for our recovery and salvation. That’s why they become, or God in them, the supreme efficient cause of our justification.[24] Therefore, being justified through the redemption in the Anointed One, Jesus.[25] Through this, the Lord the Anointed One directs our faith continually, referring all to Him that sent Him and whose will He came to do.[26] [27]

The word “Atonement” is too limited in its significance for its purpose, says Owen. It does not express all that Scripture declares that the Anointed One did to “satisfy all the demands of God’s law.” It properly signifies the ransom price for sin and nothing more. It represents only that satisfaction which the Anointed One rendered to the justice of God on our behalf by suffering the penalty due to our sins.[28]

---

[1] 1 John 3:10, 14

[2] Cf. John 17:3

[3] Jobes, Karen H., 1, 2, and 3 John (Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on The New Testament, Book 18), p. 190

[4] Guzik, David: Enduring Word, op. cit., loc. cit.

[5] Revelation 1:14

[6] Ibid. 3:16-17

[7] Ibid. 6:51, 57

[8] John 10:10, 28

[9] Ibid. 14:6

[10] Romans 5:5-9

[11] John 3:17, 34: 5:37-37; 7:29; 8:12; 10:36; 17:3, 18; 30:21

[12] Romans 5:8

[13] See John 9:4

[14] 1 Peter 2:24

[15] Ibid. 2:22

[16] 2 Timothy 2:10; See 1 John 4:9

[17] Acts of the Apostles 5:41; 1 Peter 4:16

[18] 1 Peter 2:21

[19] Epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians, Ch. 8

[20] Calvin, John: Commentary of the Catholic Epistles, op. cit., loc. cit.

[21] Trapp notes a comparison to a surgeon opening up a patient’s abdomen for all to see its contents. That is why he uses the term “bowls” as the place where we will find God’s tenderest compassion.

[22] Psalm 2:7

[23] Trapp, John: Commentary upon all books of New Testament (1647), op. cit., p

[24] See John 3:16; also, Romans 5:8; 1 John 4:9-10

[25] Romans 3:24; 5:1; Ephesians 1:6-8.

[26] Hebrews 10:5

[27] Owen, John: The Doctrine of Justification by Faith, op. cit., pp. 144-145

[28] Hodge, Archibald Alexander: The Atonement. Pneuma Press. Kindle Edition.