LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

04/06/26

Lamentations 1:7 Jeremiah has just lamented that all of Jerusalem’s beauty and majesty are gone; her noble leaders, high-ranking officials, and military commanders are like starving deer that search for pasture. They flee without the strength to stay ahead of those who chase them. It so happened, says Jeremiah, “In the days of her affliction and roaming, Jerusalem remembers all her pleasant things that she had in the days of old. When her people fell into the hands of the enemy, with no one to help her, the adversaries saw her and mocked at her downfall.” This is an emotional reflection on the fall of Jerusalem, depicting a city personified as a grieving woman haunted by memories of her former glory during such terrible devastation.  So, let us look at some of the key themes in their historical context. First, there is a reminder that brings pain. It comes during her “days of affliction and wandering” (or homelessness), Jerusalem vividly recalls the “treasures” or “pleasant things” she once possessed. This refers to both material wealth, such as the riches of Solomon’s temple, and spiritual privileges, such as her covenant relationship with God. The Babylonians have destroyed the city, and its people have been exiled. The saddest part is that “she had no one to help her.” This highlights the failure of human alliances (such as those with Egypt) and the isolation that comes from relying on political maneuvers rather than on God. A distinctive element of this is the mention of enemies mocking her “downfall.” This denotes “cessation” or “annihilation” of her festivals, and viewing the destruction of the Temple as a victory over the God of Israel. 

Jerusalem has sinned gravely, therefore she has become vile. All who honored her despise her because they have seen her nakedness; Yes, she sighs and turns away.” (v.8). This verse provides a theological and emotional core for the book, explicitly linking the catastrophic fall of Jerusalem to her moral and spiritual failures. It transitions the lament from a general observation of suffering to a specific indictment of sin as the cause of this desolation. Here we see the crushing weight of sin. The verse states, “Jerusalem has sinned greatly.” This wasn’t a single error but a “multitude of transgressions,” including idolatry and covenant-breaking, which ultimately “removed” her from God’s protection and her own land. Here, Jerusalem is personified as a woman whose “nakedness” has been exposed. In ancient Near Eastern culture, this was a metaphor for extreme disgrace and vulnerability—her secret sins and spiritual adultery were now visible to the entire world through her destruction. The verse ends with Jerusalem “sighing and turning away.” This signifies a deep, internal shame where the personified city cannot even face her own reflection or her tormentors, withdrawing into a state of hopelessness and despair.

What spiritual implications are found in these verses? They teach us that persistent, unrepentant sin leads to devastation, loss of divine protection, and public shame, as illustrated by Jerusalem’s downfall. These verses reveal that God’s judgment is righteous, that the consequences of turning away are severe, and that acknowledging personal responsibility is necessary for restoration. Why is it so easy to fall into sin and so hard to get out? I believe it is our unwillingness to repent and restore our relationship with God.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

POINTS TO PONDER

POINTS TO PONDER! 04/04/26

A couple of months ago I was listening to a Messianic Jewish Rebbi explain what Passover meant to Jews and Christians. He pointed out that he was mystified as to why the KJV used “Easter” to describe the Passover. Even though I’ve read the Bible numerous times over the years, I did not notice this translation. But sure enough, there it was in Acts 12:4 [KJV]. When I looked at the NKJV and NIV, I found that they chose the word “Passover” rather than “Easter.” I read in one place that the KJV used “Easter” to translate the Greek word pascha to differentiate the pagan holiday King Herod was observing from the Jewish Passover. The text indicates that the Passover days were already over, prompting the translators to use a term that reflects a later pagan festival. I also read that the KJV translators used “Easter” based on earlier translations, such as Tyndale, who used Martin Luther’s German Bible that translated it as “Ostern” in his New Testament English translation.

But that still doesn’t explain why they substituted the word Easter for the Greek pascha (Passover). So, I looked up the word “easter” to see its origin and perhaps find the answer. I found out that the most popular theory is that the name comes from Eostre, an Anglo-Saxon goddess of spring and fertility. According to the 8th-century monk and historian Bede, the month of April was originally called Eostre- month in her honor. As Christianity spread, the name of the month was eventually adopted to celebrate Jesus’ resurrection. So, we can see why resurrection day has been secularized with the Easter Parade, Easter Bunny, Easter Egg Hunt, wearing an Easter Bonnet, and Easter Baskets, all of which celebrate springtime but have nothing to do with Jesus’s resurrection. I can understand why the KJV translators wanted to separate our Lord’s resurrection from the Jewish Passover, even though Jesus is considered the Passover Lamb. Yet the Passover Lamb was never resurrected, so that makes our Lord’s rising from the dead a special day.

That’s why we, as Christians, must hold fast to Sunrise Services and messages about the importance and necessity of the Christ’s resurrection. The Apostle Paul explained it very well: For if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ must still be dead. And if He is still dead, then all our preaching is useless, and your trust in God is empty, worthless, hopeless; and we apostles are all liars because we have said that God raised the Christ (the Messiah) from the grave, and of course that isn’t true if the dead do not come back to life again. If they don’t, then, the Christ is still dead, and you are very foolish to keep on trusting God to save you, and you are still under condemnation for your sins; in that case, all Christians who have died are lost! And if being a Christian is of value to us only now in this life, we are the most miserable of creatures. (1 Corinthians 15:13-19).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

04/03/26

Ecclesiastes 1:9 The Preacher has just noted that everything we try to explain is unutterably weary and tiresome. No matter how much we see, we are never satisfied; no matter how much we hear, we are not content. That’s why he now exclaims, “That which has been is what will be, that which is done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun.” In other words, with respect to behavior, sinful tendencies, deeds, and mistakes, history merely repeats itself. Nothing is truly new; it has all been done or said before. What can you point to that is new? How do you know it didn’t exist long ago? This verse follows a series of observations about the repetitive cycles of the natural world: the sun rises and sets, the wind blows in circles, and rivers flow into a sea that never fills. Thus, Solomon argues that these cycles represent a wearisome, endless repetition that fails to satisfy human desire. In other words, Solomon concludes that what has happened before will happen again. Any claim that something is “new” is simply a failure of human memory regarding earlier generations. It is noteworthy that the phrase “under the sun” appears 29 times in the book and is crucial to its interpretation because it refers to life lived from a purely human, material perspective, disconnected from divine purpose or eternal significance. That means, even though technology and circumstances change, human nature remains constant. People today grapple with the same basic questions of existence, the same temptations, and the same emotional struggles as those who lived thousands of years ago. So, he asks:

Is there anything of which it may be said, ‘See, this is new’? It existed in ancient times. There is no remembrance of former things, nor will there be any remembrance of things that are to come by those who will come after.” (vv.10-11). These verses serve as a concluding argument for the “vanity” of life lived “under the sun,” highlighting the cycles of human innovation and the eventual erasure of memory. So, let’s have a reality check. The underlying principles, human behaviors, and spiritual struggles have existed in “the ages before us”. For instance, modern technological advances may change the medium, but they often address the same fundamental human needs—communication, survival, and behavior—that existed in ancient times. That’s why this verse underscores the limitations of human creativity in a closed system (under the sun). So, we must ask, if things aren’t new, why do we think they are? The Teacher explains that it is due to our collective disregard for the past. It’s like erasing history. So, just as we have paid little attention to those before us, future generations will eventually ignore what we’ve learned. That’s why Solomon is so convinced that if a person’s life and work are eventually disregarded, then striving for “immortality” through deeds or fame is futile. 

What spiritual implications do we find in these verses? They teach that life “under the sun” is cyclical, with nothing truly new, except how we do it, thereby highlighting the vanity of seeking ultimate satisfaction in earthly pursuits. It reveals that human history repeats itself, that material achievements are fleeting, and that earthly fame is quickly overlooked, thereby urging a shift from temporary worldly fixation to finding purpose in God. These verses are not intended to be merely depressing but to break the illusion that worldly efforts bring lasting satisfaction that will follow us into heaven. Jesus said it best. Don’t store up treasures here on earth where they can erode away or may be stolen. Instead, store them in heaven, where they will never lose their value and will be safe. If your treasures are in heaven, your heart will be there too. [Matthew 6:19-21]

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

04/02/26

Philippians 1:6 Paul has just thanked God for the help they gave him while he told people the Good News. You have been helped from the first day you believed until now. So now he offers them a message of hope, that they should “Be confident of this very thing, that He who has begun a good work in you will complete it until the day of Jesus the Christ.” This is one of the most celebrated promises in the New Testament, offering a bedrock of spiritual assurance. This verse reveals three primary components: the Source of our confidence, the Scope of God’s work, and the Sureness of its completion.  First, let us look at the source of confidence.  The Greek word for “confident” implies a settled conviction based on evidence. Paul’s assurance does not rest on the Philippians’ strength or will, but on the nature of God Himself. Unlike humans, who often leave projects unfinished due to a lack of interest or power, God is a faithful “Master Craftsman” who finishes what He starts. 

Then, let us examine the nature of the work.  There are two primary interpretive views of what this “good work” entails: One involves the spiritual view or sanctification. Most commentators see this as the internal work of salvation, beginning with regeneration (new birth) and continuing through a lifelong process of sanctification—the act of being conformed to the image of Christ. Then there is the mission view or partnership. Some scholars argue that, in context, the “good work” refers specifically to the Philippians’ financial assistance for Paul’s gospel ministry. They argue that God inspired their generosity and would sustain their missionary impact until the end. Many modern expositions suggest both are true: God’s internal work in the heart naturally results in external partnership in the mission. Finally, we have the sureness of completion. The Greek word for “complete” is a technical term for bringing a sacrifice to its destined goal. It suggests that God is actively “molding us” to represent His character day by day. But Paul is not finished. He wants the Philippians to see the finish line, which he refers to as the “day of Jesus the Christ,” which refers to the return of the Christ, the moment of glorification when believers are finally and fully freed from sin and see Him as He is.

Just as it is right for me to think this of you all, because I have you in my heart, inasmuch as both in my chains and in the defense and confirmation of the gospel, you all are partakers with me of grace.” (v.7). In other words, Paul is expressing how natural it is that he should feel as he does about them, for they have a very special place in his heart. That’s because they have shared the blessings of God with him, both while he was in prison and after was release, defending the truth and telling others about the Christ. We find some very interesting themes in this verse. There is Paul’s deep affection for them when he said, “I have you in my heart.” Here, Paul describes a love that goes beyond mere emotion, one that involves his entire being. This “heart” connection justifies his “right” to feel confident about their spiritual growth, as he sees God’s work in them firsthand.

Not only that, but their shared ministry “in the defense and confirmation of the gospel.”  The Greek word for “defense” refers to a legal or logical defense against accusations or false teachings. And the Greek word for “confirmation” is the positive establishment or validation of the gospel’s truth through living it out. Paul follows this with his gratefulness for their being “Partakers with me of grace.” The Philippians were not just spectators; they were active partners. In other words, they shared in the “grace” of Paul’s ministry, which included the privilege of suffering alongside him for the Christ. So, we can see that despite his imprisonment in Rome, Paul considers his bonds a “grace” from God. As such, the Philippians’ support, through gifts and prayers, made them active participants in his imprisonment and legal defense.  What spiritual implications do we find in these verses? They teach us that God initiates and guarantees the completion of our spiritual transformation until the Christ’s return, developing confidence rather than fear. They also emphasize that salvation is God’s work, not human effort, urging active partnership in the Gospel. These verses encourage believers to trust God’s faithfulness, even during trials, and to find joy in shared spiritual growth. That’s why being part of a church or fellowship is so important for spiritual steadiness and growth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

04/01/26

Psalm 7:11-13 David has just proclaimed that God helps people who want to do right so that He will protect them. Now David explains such trust in God’s faithfulness by saying, “God is a just judge, and God is angry with the wicked every day. If he does not turn back, He will sharpen His sword; He bends His bow and makes it ready. He also prepares for Himself instruments of death; He makes His arrows into fiery shafts.” This psalm begins with a heartfelt plea by David, who is facing false accusations and slander from an enemy, possibly “Cush, a Benjamite” who was likely a follower or supporter of King Saul, David’s rival, and part of the court faction that accused David of plotting against Saul. But David boldly declares his innocence and, rather than seeking revenge himself, calls upon God to act as the ultimate judge. As such, this psalm transitions from a personal cry for help to a confident declaration of God’s universal justice. So, David declares, “God is a just judge.” This serves as the foundation of David’s confidence. That’s because God is perfectly just; He can be trusted to judge all people fairly, whether they are accusers or innocent. Unlike human judges who can be swayed by bias, God’s righteousness ensures His judgments are always sound. This is a comforting thought for the upright who are being maligned. Not only that, but “God is angry with the wicked every day.” This second phrase is a powerful statement about God’s consistent and unending hatred for sin. This is clearly a direct consequence of God’s holy and righteous nature, which must have an aversion to sin. This is not a human-like temper tantrum but a righteous indignation against moral evil. That’s why the phrase “every day” emphasizes that God’s displeasure with wickedness is not a sporadic event but a continuous reality. Although God is slow to anger, His wrath is consistently present as long as sin remains.

What David says next is best understood when taken in the context of verse 14. This means that if the wicked person does not change their attitude and evil intentions, things will only worsen. Some earlier. interpretations suggested that the verse refers to the wicked person preparing their weapons to cause harm beyond mere false accusations. Others take a broader view of the psalm, emphasizing God’s divine justice and the ultimate vindication of the righteous, making it clear that the weapons being prepared are instruments of God’s righteous judgment.  The Hebrew word for “repent” means “to turn back” or “to return,” a theme central to biblical calls for repentance, something God never needs to do. The sharpening of a sword is a military metaphor that signals readiness for battle. Also, bending his bow means being prepared to shoot on short notice. The bow is strung, with an arrow already aimed and ready to be released.

Ask yourself, why would God make weapons of death when He has power over life and death by His word? Or does this mean that God is preparing weapons of death for others to use? Does that mean God is involved in weaponizing assassins? David gives an interesting definition of the wicked’s weapons in Psalm 12:2. Therefore, the assertion that “the weapons in verses 12-13 were the wicked man’s armor” is a theological interpretation that emphasizes the contrast between the wicked’s tools and God’s righteous methods. Thus, the weapons are not literal armor, but rather the deceitful words and actions of the wicked, which they use for self-preservation and attacks. The psalmist, in turn, finds protection and refuge in God’s pure and perfect words. Nevertheless, this verse serves as a vivid metaphor for divine judgment, depicting God as a warrior of divine power preparing for battle against the wicked. This image follows a warning to the unrepentant in the preceding verse, assuring the righteous that God will ultimately bring justice. 

This involves some key imagery and themes, such as “Instruments of death.” This phrase symbolizes the array of tools at God’s disposal to bring punishment. They are not merely improvised weapons but have been specifically “prepared” and made ready for use. This readiness implies that judgment is certain, not a spontaneous afterthought. Then we have “fiery shafts” or “flaming arrows.” This refers to the ancient practice of using arrows tipped with flammable material to cause maximum destruction. The image symbolizes the consuming, intense, and certain nature of God’s retribution. The arrows are also seen as a metaphor for God’s lightnings. Some commentators connect the “burning” arrows to “hot” or “burning” persecutors, indicating that God’s fiery wrath is aimed specifically at those who burn with rage and malice against the righteous. However, the message applies to all the wicked who refuse to repent, not just those who persecute. Furthermore, this verse emphasizes that God has prepared for the destruction of the wicked, indicating that arrangements for judgment are in place. It is only God’s forbearance and long-suffering that cause delay, not a lack of readiness. For the wicked, their destruction is both imminent and inevitable if they do not change course. 

So, what theological implications do we gather from these verses? They teach us that God does not overlook evil, and his delayed wrath is an expression of mercy, encouraging sinners to turn back, while assuring the righteous that justice will be served. He is a righteous, active judge who feels daily indignation toward sin, yet offers space for repentance before executing judgment. This passage also warns against taking sin lightly. It portrays the continual awareness and intolerance of sin by God, noting that His indignation is “every day”. This constant stance against evil underscores the holiness required of those who follow Him.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

03/31/26

John 1:9: The apostle John has already told us that John the Baptizer was not the Light; he was only a witness to identify it and tell others about it. The apostle then explains that Light “Was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world.” In other words, Jesus was the true Light who came to shine on everyone born into the world. Here, the Apostle John focuses on Jesus’ role as the authentic source of spiritual illumination for all humanity. Let us look at some core theological themes in this verse: First, Jesus was the “True” Light. The Greek word for “light” signifies that Jesus is the “genuine” or “ultimate” light, in contrast to temporary or imperfect lights such as John the Baptist or the Old Testament law. He is the source from which all other reflections of truth derive. Then the second is that Jesus’ light was a universal illumination. So, how does Jesus “give light to everyone”? It is the anticipation of God’s Grace. Many scholars suggest this refers to a general revelation or “inner light” given to all people through reason and conscience, enabling them to recognize their moral need for God. Thirdly, we must separate exposure to the Light from salvation through the Light. Most agree it does not mean universal salvation, but rather that the Christ’s presence exposes the spiritual state of every person, leaving them without excuse for rejecting the truth.

He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him.” (v.10). This highlights a profound irony: the Creator of the universe entered His own creation, yet remained unrecognized by the humanity He brought into existence. There are some key components in this explanation. (1) “He was in the world.” The use of the imperfect tense (in) suggests a continual existence rather than a one-time event. While this refers to His physical incarnation, many commentators also see it as His ongoing presence through wisdom and power since the beginning of time. (2) We now encounter a seeming contradiction. “The world was made through Him.”  Here, John reinforces the Divinity of the Christ by repeating that He is the Agent of creation. The irony is that the world—the masterpiece—did not recognize its Master. (3) How was that possible? They rejected Him because they did not know him. The Greek word for “know” implies more than intellectual awareness; it refers to experiential, relational knowledge. By using the word “world,” John was referring to the human system in rebellion against God. Humanity’s spiritual blindness, caused by a preference for darkness and sin, prevented them from acknowledging Him for who He was.

He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him.” (v.11). This is often described as the “supreme tragedy of history,” highlighting the irony of the Creator being rejected by His personal creation. There are some significant Greek wordplays, not seen in the English translation, that deepen its meaning. Let’s look at the phrase, “He came to His own.” This refers to His own domain, home, or property. In a broad sense, the entire world is His possession as the Creator. More specifically, it refers to the land of Israel, which God designated as His “peculiar possession” in the Old Testament [Ex. 19:5]. It is like saying “He came home,” emphasizing that the Incarnation was not a visit from an alien, but a return to His rightful place. Then we have “And His Own Did Not Receive Him.” This refers to His own people or family, primarily to the Jewish nation, God’s covenant people who had been prepared for centuries through prophets and law for the Messiah’s arrival. Also, the Greek word for “receive” implies a welcoming, personal acceptance. Their failure was not merely a lack of information, but a willful refusal to welcome Him as Master of the house.  What spiritual implications do we find in these verses? We are taught that Jesus is the universal “true light” who offers divine illumination to all. Yet, he was largely rejected by the world and His own people, highlighting that humanity faces a stark choice between recognizing Him as Creator or falling into spiritual blindness, and that true faith requires receiving Him despite this widespread rejection. The same is true today. Even though the world at large does not acknowledge Him for who He is, it is up to us to keep the light of His presence in our hearts and minds burning.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

03/30/26

Ruth 1:8 Earlier, we are told that Naomi and her two daughters-in-law left Moab, where they had been living, and started walking to the land of Judah. That’s when, “Naomi said to her two daughters-in-law, ‘Go, return each to her mother’s house. The Lord deal kindly with you, as you have dealt with the dead and with me.’” Now we see that Naomi urges her Moabite daughters-in-law, Orpah and Ruth, to return to their people, bestowing a heartfelt blessing and prayer that the Lord (Yahweh) would reward them for their faithfulness and grant them security through new marriages. This occurs when Naomi is leaving Moab because she decided to return to Bethlehem following the deaths of her husband and two sons. This involved a journey covering approximately 50 to 75 miles of rugged terrain, typically taking 7–10 days on foot. The route involved descending the Moabite plateau, crossing the Jordan River near the Dead Sea, and a steep 3,000 ft ascent to Bethlehem.

We also see that Naomi’s instruction for her daughters-in-law to go to their mother’s home emphasizes a tender desire for the comfort and close relationship found in a maternal household, which was common in that culture. It was the most practical choice, as their strongest remaining family ties were in Moab. Naomi also has a blessing for your two daughters-in-law. “May the LORD deal kindly with you“: In a display of strong faith despite her suffering. Here, Naomi invokes the covenant name of Israel’s God, Yahweh (the LORD), not the Moabite gods. It is significant that the Hebrew word for “kindly” denotes loyal, steadfast covenant love and devotion. This is a prayer that God would show them the same covenant faithfulness that is central to the Israelite faith. Naomi then qualifies her prayer that God would be kind to them “just as you have dealt with the dead and with me.” Thus, Naomi commends her daughters-in-law for the loyal love and care they showed to their deceased husbands while they were alive, as well as their ongoing filial duty and kindness towards her in her widowhood. Their actions demonstrated exceptional devotion that exceeded cultural expectations.

The Lord grant that you may find rest, each in the house of her husband.” So, she kissed them, and they lifted their voices and wept.” (v.9) This verse concludes with a powerful, emotional scene as Naomi kisses them goodbye and all three women weep aloud, highlighting the depth of their bond and the sorrow of their situation. Let’s look at some key factors in this verse. First, we have the Hebrew word for “rest.” This word signifies more than just a break from work; it implies security, peace, provision, and a settled life, which was primarily found through marriage and integration into a new family household in their ancient patriarchal society. A widow without a husband or sons was in a very vulnerable social and economic position. Then we consider Naomi’s prayer as a generous, selfless blessing, wishing for her daughters-in-law the best possible future according to the cultural norms of the time. This demonstrates her deep affection for them, despite her own personal bitterness and sense of loss. We must also consider the role of the Levirate Law, which mandates that, if a man dies childless, his brother must marry the widow to produce an heir, thereby ensuring that the deceased’s name and inheritance continue. We then observe the emotional climax of this moment. The weeping of the three women underscores the genuine love and attachment that had formed over their ten years together, as well as the shared grief over their losses and the uncertainty of their futures. This emotional bond is a key factor in Ruth’s steadfast decision to stay with Naomi, as described later in the chapter. By invoking the name of Yahweh, the covenant God of Israel, over these Moabite women, Naomi is entrusting them to His sovereign care, even as she encourages them to return to their country. This highlights the compassionate heart of God, who is at work even amid their tragedy. 

What spiritual implications do these verses reveal to us? They teach us that true kindness involves selfless sacrifice, desiring God’s blessing for others even at personal cost. It underscores the importance of trusting God’s providence to provide comfort in times of distress and exemplifies the power of blessing those who have been loyal. But they also reveal deep spiritual themes of God’s active presence amid hardship as a path to redemption, and the importance of helping His people strive, even in hard times and loss, showing how loyalty and faith transform barrenness into new life and purpose, mirroring the Christian journey. In everyday life, if you don’t want a speeding ticket or to be arrested for shoplifting, just follow the Law. The same goes for God’s law. He will bless those who are loyal to His Word and Will.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

03/27/26

Jeremiah 1:8 After Jeremiah told the LORD he was not a good speaker because he was so young, God replied to this excuse, saying that Jeremiah would go wherever He sends him and speak whatever He tells him to say. Since God knew what Jeremiah’s real fears were based on, He then told him, “Do not be afraid of their faces, for I am with you to deliver you,” says the LORD.” God’s assurances further address Jeremiah’s fear. Here, God anticipates the real risks Jeremiah will face—opposition, threat, and ridicule. Yet the LORD assures His presence and deliverance. Historically, Jeremiah faced imprisonment and hostility in Jerusalem, but he survived amidst national turmoil because God sustained him. The theme of fear is also prevalent in this verse, as God instructs Jeremiah not to be afraid of the people’s glaring stares he will encounter. This fear could stem from the potential consequences of delivering God’s message to a disobedient and rebellious people, as well as from the rejection and opposition he might face. God’s use of “their faces” refers to the people Jeremiah was being sent to, including kings, priests, and the general populace, who would likely oppose and persecute him for his pronouncements of judgment. It encompasses both personal weakness and the potential threat from those who would be enraged by Jeremiah’s messages. 

However, God encourages Jeremiah not to fear their reactions or hostility, because His presence is enough to overcome any fear. Also in this verse, we see that God’s assurance of deliverance conveys hope and confidence, showing that Jeremiah can trust God to protect and save him in the face of any challenges or threats. Furthermore, the language used in this verse conveys a sense of authority and assurance. Jeremiah could now go on this assurance from the LORD: “For I am with you to deliver you.” This promise assures that Jeremiah would not face challenges alone. God’s presence signifies assistance and guidance for Jeremiah in fulfilling his prophetic role. The awareness of God’s presence was intended to instill courage and overcome Jeremiah’s natural inclination toward timidity. The phrase “says the LORD” underscores the authority and certainty of God’s words and promises. It further indicates that this promise comes directly from God Himself, reinforcing the certainty of His presence and deliverance. Jeremiah’s initial protests about his youth and inability to speak highlight the contrast between human weakness and God’s power to equip those called for His service. The themes, context, and symbolism in this verse highlight the timeless truth that we are not alone in our callings and can find confidence and courage in God’s presence.

Then the Lord put forth His hand and touched my mouth, and the Lord said to me: ‘Behold, I have put My words in your mouth.’” (v.9). God touching Jeremiah’s mouth symbolizes God anointing Jeremiah to speak on His behalf. This signifies that the power of Jeremiah’s message comes from God, not human eloquence. This also emphasizes that Jeremiah’s message originates from God and carries divine authority. Prophets served as channels for God’s words, foreshadowing Jesus as the living Word of God. The words given to Jeremiah have a dual purpose: to expose and dismantle, and to bring about restoration and new life. This shows a balance of judgment and mercy in God’s message, demonstrating that God’s word is powerful and will accomplish His will. Despite Jeremiah’s feelings of inadequacy, God’s promise to put words in his mouth gave him the confidence he needed. Jeremiah’s acceptance of God’s words exemplifies obedience, highlighting that God equips those He calls for their assignments.  What theological implications are found in these verses? They teach us that God’s calling is not limited by human weakness, age, or insecurity, as He qualifies those He calls, regardless of perceived inexperience or inadequacy. It highlights that obedience matters more than self-confidence and that God provides the necessary words and strength through His Word to overcome excuses and fear. There are two important things to keep in mind when a person is called to preach God’s Word: your inadequacies are no barrier to God, and you are never sent alone without His Holy Spirit to inspire you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

POINTS TO PONDER

03/28/26

In recent weeks, we have heard the term “negotiations” used repeatedly. There are “negotiations” with Iran, “negotiations” with the big oil companies, with pharmaceuticals, teachers’ unions, etc. So, I started thinking, what does the term “negotiation” really mean? I consulted Daniel Webster’s Dictionary, and it defines it as a “discussion aimed at reaching an agreement.” It is derived from the Latin negōtiātus, meaning “to carry on business”. It is rooted in negotium (“business, employment, affair”), which literally means “lack of leisure.” It implies “Busyness” or “not having leisure.” In other words, “stop playing around and get serious.”

Then I decided to see what psychologists have to say. I found out that they view the word negotiation not just as a business transaction, but as a fundamental, daily human interaction characterized by a “joint decision-making process involving interactive communication.” Then I read that psychologists also broadly define it as “interactions between two or more points of view”. This includes everything from salary talks to deciding where to have dinner with a spouse. In other words, to negotiate is to choose communication over conflict to resolve differences. For some, a successful negotiation is increasingly seen as a “win-win” collaborative problem-solving exercise rather than a “winner-takes-all” battle where one side must lose for the other to gain. Meanwhile, while it feels to the mind like a strategic negotiation, it is deeply emotional. Decisions are often driven by an “emotional mind” that can overpower the “logical mind.” We find out that effective negotiations often hinge on addressing “core concerns” such as independence, appreciation, affiliation, status, and fulfilling roles. It is also reported that using the word “fairness” is often used as a powerful tool to yield better offers and maintain positive relationships. The biological impact is that creating common ground in negotiations can activate reward circuits in the brain, release a chemical messenger often called “feel-good,” and act on the brain’s reward and motivation center.

With all that said, what does the Bible say about negotiation? God’s Word explicitly warns against negotiating with the devil, framing any interaction as a temptation to be resisted rather than a deal to be made. Instead of bargaining, scripture advocates submitting to God and resisting Satan, causing him to flee. Jesus, in the wilderness, refused all deals, setting a precedent of rebuking with God’s word. In summary, the Bible advises that negotiations with the devil are deceptive traps, and the only appropriate response is total rejection, maintained through adherence to God’s authority.

Well, then, what about negotiations with God? The Bible generally advises against bargaining or “negotiating” with God, urging instead trust, obedience, and direct prayer. While figures like Jacob and Abraham interceded or made vows, God is depicted as sovereign rather than a partner in a business deal. A true relationship with God is based on grace, not conditions. The apostle Paul made that clear when he said, “Who can know what is on the Lord’s mind? Who can give Him any advice? But we have been given the Christ’s way of thinking.” (1 Cor 2:16).

And finally, what does the Scriptures say about negotiating with each other? The Bible does not use the modern term “negotiation” as a formal business concept. Still, it provides extensive guidance on the principles of dialogue, compromise, and mutual agreement for resolving conflicts and conducting affairs. Biblical negotiation is rooted in pursuing peace, acting with integrity, and valuing others’ interests alongside your own. One core biblical principle for negotiation is to prioritize relationships over winning: A central theme is valuing the other person more than yourself (Philippians 2:3-4). Instead of a “competitive” approach in which you look out only for your own interests, the Bible encourages a “cooperative” approach aimed at solutions that benefit everyone involved. Scripture also encourages us to seek wisdom and guidance: Before entering a negotiation or addressing a conflict, believers are encouraged to seek God’s wisdom through prayer (James 1:5). And one important principle is to listen first, speak second: Effective negotiation requires active listening to understand the other party’s needs, fears, and limitations. Proverbs 18:13 warns that answering before hearing is “folly and shame.” We should never approach a brother or sister without absolute integrity: Honesty is non-negotiable. Ephesians 4:25 instructs believers to speak truthfully with their neighbors. Negotiations should be conducted justly and fairly, without greed or exploitation. That’s why the ultimate goal of resolving disputes is often peace rather than just a “deal.” Romans 12:18 advises living at peace with everyone as far as it depends on you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LESSONS FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES

03/26/26

Ephesians 1:8 Paul has just told the Ephesians that because of God’s overflowing kindness, He took away all their sins through the blood of His Son, by whom they were saved, “Which He made to abound toward us in all wisdom and prudence.” Paul now continues his praise of God’s abundant grace, highlighting that this grace is given to believers along with wisdom and farsightedness. This underscores the generous and purposeful nature of God’s provision for His people. The phrase “made to abound” uses a Greek word that signifies overflowing and exceeding measure. This emphasizes the vastness and generosity of God’s grace, going beyond mere sufficiency to being more than enough. It also highlights the unmerited favor believers receive through the Christ.  Also, “Wisdom” refers to divine insight and an understanding of spiritual truth. It is the ability to see things from God’s perspective and correctly apply that knowledge to our lives. This is followed by “Prudence,’’ not just intellectual knowledge but the practical application of God’s truth to daily life. As such, “Prudence” [spiritual understanding] complements wisdom, denoting a deeper grasp of God’s will and purposes, enabling discerning choices in line with His plan. These are not earned but freely given by God, indicating His desire for us to live wisely. They are not gained through human intellect alone, but are a supernatural gift from God, received through the work of the Holy Spirit.

Having made known to us the mystery of His according to His good pleasure which He purposed in Himself” (v.9). The Greek word for “mystery” does not imply something incomprehensible or reserved for a select few, as in some ancient religions or cults. Rather, it refers to something that was previously hidden or unknown but has now been revealed by God. This is a crucial distinction, as it emphasizes that while the knowledge was beyond human discovery, it’s now openly accessible through God’s gracious revelation. This revelation involved “The mystery of His will.” This then refers to God’s plan to unite all things in the Christ, both Jews and Gentiles, into one body – the church. This was a truth not explicitly revealed in the Old Testament, but now fully disclosed through the gospel and the work of Jesus the Christ. This disclosure underscores the incredible reach of God’s grace and the breadth of His redemptive plan, encompassing all of humanity. All this was done “According to His good pleasure.”The revelation of this mystery stems entirely from God’s sovereign and gracious choice, not from any human merit or effort. It’s a gift of His benevolent nature and a testament to His desire to share His plans with His people.

This emphasizes that the source of God’s plan is His own “good pleasure” or “kind intention.” His motives for proposing this plan are rooted in His love and goodness, and ultimately in His desire to bring all things together under the headship of the Christ “Which He purposed in Himself.” This highlights God’s absolute sovereignty and independence. His purpose is not a reaction to humanity’s actions or a response to external circumstances, but an inner determination that originates within His divine nature. This implies that the purpose existed “in Himself” before creation and before any historical events unfolded. It is an unchangeable and eternal decree. In addition, the phrase “purposed in Himself” also implies that God did not need counsel or advice from anyone else to formulate His plan, reflecting passages like Romans 11:34. While the purpose was “in Himself” for ages, it was a mystery, a truth previously hidden but now revealed through Jesus the Christ, particularly to those who believe. This mystery encompasses God’s redemptive work, which involves the salvation of both Jews and Gentiles and unites them into one body, the church.  What theological implications are there in these verses? They teach us that God has lavished His grace upon believers, granting them spiritual wisdom to understand the “mystery of His will.” This mystery centers on God’s purposeful plan, fulfilled in the Christ, to unite all things and include Gentiles as fellow heirs. That means God has a purposeful plan for their lives, and it is up to them to seek His wisdom to better understand that purpose.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment